Guest viewing is limited

Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA

Status
Not open for further replies.
It was the game we knew it would be... A defensive battle. Titans O did enough to win... The kicker left 12 points off the board. As simple as that.
 
He didn't cross the line of scrimmage, even the announcers said so. They explained inside and out how it was a touchdown. It sure didn't take New York (Bills) long to review the obvious touchdown play.
I was wondering how they didn’t overturn that. He was clearly not across. Cost us the game.
 
This game comes down 2 santos missing his kicks. The o wasnt great but they have a great defense. Our d did thier job again and the o got us in place for atlest 16 points.
 
Titans had 91 yards on offense in the first half and were 0-6 on third down. Can you put that on the kicker or the refs?
 
All this attention on Santos is Saffold’s best scenario. I mean Saffold blows. JRob missed badly bringing this turnstile in.
 
Not that they lost the game, but I don't get why Gore and Yeldon were able to run the ball when it was crucial that we shut down the run at that point. We held them in check all game long, but couldn't stop them when we knew they were running it to seal the game.
from my All22 perspective .... the Bills saved those misdirection plays till they needed them.
 
In no way did the announcers say he did not cross the line.

The fact that it was CONFIRMED and not INCONCLUSIVE proves that they had the video evidence to prove he was across the line of scrimmage. They only gave us one angle and then went to commercial. I am sure the reviewers had multiple angles.
they showed MM8 ever so slightly beyond the LOS in stadium replay... never would have called Rivers for that
 
Why don't you re-read what you just wrote...

You are saying the announcers gave us the definition of the rule. Giving a definition is not the same as them saying that he DID not cross the line. They never said. You are basing everything you are saying on one camera angle (that to me looked like he was over).

Once again, to confirm they have to have conclusive evidence. They could have said it was inconclusive and the play stands as it was called on the field, but they did not say that. They said it was confirmed.

I am sorry that explaining the rules to you makes me a troll.
The flag was dropped immediately. The points went on the board as the Ref called the foul. That is normal, even with a holding call, td is called, then the penalty is called. So if that penalty had not been on the offense, then it would have been a TD.
that flag was super late... I mean l....a....t....e
 
same one step forward two step backward titans...that 4th and 4....field goal brought back nightmares of Fisher; that was a horrible call. Vrabel lost a lot of shine on that one; talk about playing not to lose instead of playing to win. You have a kicker than can't kick it in the ocean but you expect him to kick a plus 50 yarder...
 
For once, this one is not on Mariota. Yes, he didnt play great and he could have / should have played better (as usual), but the offense played well enough to get this one. Penalties at the worst time cost at least 1 TD and Santos cost at LEAST 6 points. I will give him the benefit on the two he missed from 50+, those are at the limit of his range.

Penalties, dropped balls, some poor playcalls and lack of a consistent pass rush cost this one. Cant wait for Simmons to play!! DL really struggles. Hope we can draft another DL to go with Simmons and another OLB next draft.
 
6 drops of MM8 passes today .... plus the chunk & TD nurffed by Rogers Devils
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vrabel lost his mind . Everyone knew that guy was gonna miss that 52 yarder . Wtf ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top