Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ehh, I think Goff is alright and I haven’t seen mcvay with a different QB to compare your point.Foles sucks, so does Goff. Both of those two players flourish beacause of a really talented roster combined with two great HCs in the league.
Ehh, I think Goff is alright and I haven’t seen mcvay with a different QB to compare your point.
Foles didn’t even flourish. He has 1 really good season under chip Kelly. Since that season, he’s been replaced as the starter twice (philly 1 and Stl) and sign specifically as a backup twice (KC and philly 2).
His injury in Jax was the best thing for him. He can’t prove, again, that he is t a starter.
I wish we could somehow get a vet at QB , like a Stafford . Although we sucked at the time , I felt ok when we got Hasselbeck , felt like dude knew what he was doing back there. Now our D is solid and we have pieces on offense , I’m just not feeling having to start all over with a rookie . The thought in and of itself is exhausting.
I wish we could somehow get a vet at QB , like a Stafford . Although we sucked at the time , I felt ok when we got Hasselbeck , felt like dude knew what he was doing back there. Now our D is solid and we have pieces on offense , I’m just not feeling having to start all over with a rookie . The thought in and of itself is exhausting.
Major dice roll and we tend to be a tad unlucky . Faith in J Rob ? lolIts okay to start a rookie, as long as we draft the right rookie.
Realistically as a percentage, what’s our chances of drafting a top ten qb? Just asking . Do our chances increase with JRob making the pick?The league is set up right now to succeed with a rookie. The low cap hit allows you to build around them.
At least it isn't like the old days when you were paying some rookie qb a boatload when he hadn't done squat yet.
We need our guy. Not some retread. And any vet who hits the market is mediocre at best, and expensive.
That’s 1 play. I’m not trying to sell Goff as anything more than good and even that is debatable.Did you not see Goff in the SB game? Dude had a WR open in the endzone for about 15 seconds and still didnt see him? Goff is garbage. He just has stud players on offense. His production took a massive hit when Kupp went out last year.
Although this is part of the reason there is a regular rotation of teams reaching for a QB in the first round. On occasion, a team gets lucky with one that will actually fit the bill.The league is set up right now to succeed with a rookie. The low cap hit allows you to build around them.
At least it isn't like the old days when you were paying some rookie qb a boatload when he hadn't done squat yet.
We need our guy. Not some retread. And any vet who hits the market is mediocre at best, and expensive.
Peyton Manning struggled in the Postseason and got schooled by the NO defense.That’s 1 play. I’m not trying to sell Goff as anything more than good and even that is debatable.
Got it though, you think he sucks.
We'll do just good enough to be where we always are in the draft (18-20) and be left with scraps in the 1st when selecting a QB that analyst will say doesnt have much production but has high potential.
Or second best on his own teamMaybe I used the wrong word, I am so so sorry.
Bottom line, a second overall pick, 5th yr QB shouldn't be the 6th best QB in his own division.
So you’re saying that 17 teams (including the titans) are forever bottom feeders because the NFL doesn’t like them?
Who are those teams, the not “chosen” ones?
I know this seems like a question I could look up and speculate myself, but I’m actually curious to see your list.
Nonsense.I don' know about not liking them. It' simply their job to lose.
I gave a general number. It' obvious who the preferred teams are. Just look through history. Houston was always cut short. Now as Tennessee, still shorted.
Both south divisions, except for Colts, will always suck except for the occasional bone. Tenn got a SB loss for moving. It will be years before they sniff another one. Same for Texans,Jets, Chargers,Saints,Bucs, Bengals, kc..yeah some of the teams seem good now but they've been there before and never cross the championship border.
I don' know about not liking them. It' simply their job to lose.
I gave a general number. It' obvious who the preferred teams are. Just look through history. Houston was always cut short. Now as Tennessee, still shorted.
Both south divisions, except for Colts, will always suck except for the occasional bone. Tenn got a SB loss for moving. It will be years before they sniff another one. Same for Texans,Jets, Chargers,Saints,Bucs, Bengals, kc..yeah some of the teams seem good now but they've been there before and never cross the championship border.
OK- I think most people would be willing to listen to arguments that the refs are at times instructed to make calls to keep the game entertaining. And as a stretch, an even small portion of viewers would support that larger market (revenue) teams are given a favored approach. But without a smoking gun, nobody will ever believe the NFL is as rigged as you're suggesting.
I am interested to see if the Titans get some "no-calls" in response to the heavy holding we got dinged with before Brady went to twitter. Riveron called an ad hoc ref meeting that Saturday after our TNF. Holding calls were down from ~9 per game to 2.6. We definitely got penalized excessively (and selectively) in week 3. So your points aren't entirely tin foil hat crazy, maybe just facial tick crazy.
Should be some
Should be a decent class to draft a QB this year. We will have to pay a price to move into position, but I think we have a good chance of bringing home a stud.
you cant say "some amount of favoritism." and then say "but not fixed". its one and the same. Bias = intended lying.OK- I think most people would be willing to listen to arguments that the refs are at times instructed to make calls to keep the game entertaining. And as a stretch, an even small portion of viewers would support that larger market (revenue) teams are given a favored approach. But without a smoking gun, nobody will ever believe the NFL is as rigged as you're suggesting.
I am interested to see if the Titans get some "no-calls" in response to the heavy holding we got dinged with before Brady went to twitter. Riveron called an ad hoc ref meeting that Saturday after our TNF. Holding calls were down from ~9 per game to 2.6. We definitely got penalized excessively (and selectively) in week 3. So your points aren't entirely tin foil hat crazy, maybe just facial tick crazy.