Guest viewing is limited

Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a very small sample size, but I was encouraged to see what his skills showed us about the talent around him. As much as I have been a fan of Mariota's character and extra playmaking ability with his legs, it was rare to see him throw the ball with anything close to Tannehill's zip. It's also interesting to note that the O-line seemed better with Kelly at right tackle. We have some playmakers on this team.
 
It all depends where we finish out. If we win too many games and lose out on any of the top QBs in the draft, you have to keep Tanny.
 
I only voted no because it's too early to judge and I'm wanting a rookie to come in and be the franchise guy. Tammy is going to want a huge contract some assurance he's the starter for years aka franchise QB
 
Ride THill until there is a better QB available. I still think Bridgewater would come to TN. Draft a QB next year in either the 2nd or 3rd round. 1st Round has to go for a stud Pass rusher, or find one in FA. The D is too good to rebuild right now. It can be an elite D if it has a consistent pass rush. The thing that burned them against rivers was the lack of pass rush, so he was able to abuse Woodyard in coverage. Pass rush would settle that issue real quick.

I would package Mariota, Adoree Jackson, and our 1st round pick to move up for a stud Pass rusher in the next draft, if one is available.
 
Tungtide said:
It's a very small sample size, but I was encouraged to see what his skills showed us about the talent around him. As much as I have been a fan of Mariota's character and extra playmaking ability with his legs, it was rare to see him throw the ball with anything close to Tannehill's zip. It's also interesting to note that the O-line seemed better with Kelly at right tackle. We have some playmakers on this team.
Click to expand...

I wasn't as impressed with Kellys performance yesterday

https://twitter.com/x/status/1186042468439134211
 
Tannehill is not the answer, he is just light years better than Mariota.
We absolutely need to draft a QB for the future. In the meantime if we can get Tannehill on a 3 year deal for under 12mil a year, I would sign him for 3 years, go draft a qb and start grooming our future qb while Tannehill carries us along.
 
Rwill said:
Bosa is exceptionally good. Not going to be a lot of tackles who can contain him.
Click to expand...

Oh he is absolutely a beast but I would of liked to see Kelly hold up a little better based off past performances of his.
 
XO said:
How can anyone answer this question yet

ask me again around the middle of December
Click to expand...

That's no fun. It's about risking your rep with speculation. Everybody has the SAME answer in December.
 
XO said:
How can anyone answer this question yet

ask me again around the middle of December
Click to expand...
I was already on the “keep THill” idea.

I mentioned it in another thread, keep THill as the vet for a rookie next season to sit behind. If he makes it the full year, great. The rookie got an entire year of learning.
If he only makes it a few weeks, great. Hopefully the rookie is ready to go.

Either way, provided his agent doesn’t aim for unrealistic goals, THill should get a very manageable 3 yea contract to continue as the vet starter/mentor backup for whichever rookie we get.

No matter what, move on from MM.
 
HurrayTitans! said:
I was already on the “keep THill” idea.

I mentioned it in another thread, keep THill as the vet for a rookie next season to sit behind. If he makes it the full year, great. The rookie got an entire year of learning.
If he only makes it a few weeks, great. Hopefully the rookie is ready to go.

Either way, provided his agent doesn’t aim for unrealistic goals, THill should get a very manageable 3 yea contract to continue as the vet starter/mentor backup for whichever rookie we get.

No matter what, move on from MM.
Click to expand...
So....what kind of money....and it looks like tranny pretty much wants to be a starter and paid like it
 
If he leads us to the playoffs and plays well along the way, I say keep him. But we gotta have a plan to draft a QB soon. My idea is to trade down and get as many 2021 high draft picks that you can so we can draft Lawrence No. 1 overall.
 
Rwill said:
Tannehill is not the answer, he is just light years better than Mariota.
We absolutely need to draft a QB for the future. In the meantime if we can get Tannehill on a 3 year deal for under 12mil a year, I would sign him for 3 years, go draft a qb and start grooming our future qb while Tannehill carries us along.
Click to expand...
Until he proves otherwise, he's the guy. You draft a QB with the hopes that they throw 300+ yards and have a 100+ QB rating. If it continues, it wouldn't be smart to roll the dice and assume we can develop the next superstar. That's backfired numerous times.
 
Money? Starting qb is gonna cost about 25 -30 million per....and of course, assuming Mahomes comes back from his injury the same he is going to drastically change the qb pay scale.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Carp said:
If he leads us to the playoffs and plays well along the way, I say keep him. But we gotta have a plan to draft a QB soon. My idea is to trade down and get as many 2021 high draft picks that you can so we can draft Lawrence No. 1 overall.
Click to expand...
PLAYOFFS, playoffs, don't talk about playoffs...you kidding me!
 
abc2330 said:
Until he proves otherwise, he's the guy. You draft a QB with the hopes that they throw 300+ yards and have a 100+ QB rating. If it continues, it wouldn't be smart to roll the dice and assume we can develop the next superstar. That's backfired numerous times.
Click to expand...
Regardless we need to be drafting for the future. 1. Tannehill isn't a young guy. 2. Tannehill has a history of injuries. 3. If we find a good value for a future qb in the draft, we need to take it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top