Guest viewing is limited

Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m a fan of Brown

Thats a poor way to draft. If this wasn’t such a heavy draft for pass rushers, I’d agree, but I think we can find a very capable guy in the 2nd.

I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t likely to be back next year, we need the offense with a bit of experience if we bring in a new guy.

No, a poor way to approach the draft is "we went defense last year so i think we should go offense this year" lol cmon man
 
No, a poor way to approach the draft is "we went defense last year so i think we should go offense this year" lol cmon man
Never said that

We've done it the past few years, and its a heavy pass rusher draft. We are likely to find a capable starter in the 2nd.

It's common knowledge you don't draft for need, that is what free agency is for. Draft BPA, fill needs in FA.

You eventually have to start getting young skill position players on offense, and I think we are in a pretty good spot to do that at 19.
 
Never said that

We've done it the past few years, and its a heavy pass rusher draft. We are likely to find a capable starter in the 2nd.

It's common knowledge you don't draft for need, that is what free agency is for. Draft BPA, fill needs in FA.

You eventually have to start getting young skill position players on offense, and I think we are in a pretty good spot to do that at 19.

I think we approach it the way we did last year..... get a guy in the 2nd to learn, like landry did with Morgan last year.

1st round last year was generally the same way, draft Evans to learn behind Woody before we kick him to curb.

However, 1st round this year has to be to fill a MAJOR MAJOR needs - interior rush
 
I think we approach it the way we did last year..... get a guy in the 2nd to learn, like landry did with Morgan last year.

1st round last year was generally the same way, draft Evans to learn behind Woody before we kick him to curb.

However, 1st round this year has to be to fill a MAJOR MAJOR needs - interior rush
I won’t be upset with it.

Like I said, take BPA, and that could easily be a pass rusher. I just think you could snag one in the second round.

I just think it’s a poor strategy to load up so heavily on defense in the draft, and in 4 years you have half your defense leaving or eating up monster contracts. Some balance is good.

We could really be hurting on offense if DW doesn’t come back strong and Henry doesn’t pick up where he left off. I just don’t think we’ve done enough there, imo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I won’t be upset with it.

Like I said, take BPA, and that could easily be a pass rusher. I just think you could snag one in the second round.

I just think it’s a poor strategy to load up so heavily on defense in the draft, and in 4 years you have half your defense leaving or eating up monster contracts. Some balance is good.

We could really be hurting on offense if DW doesn’t come back strong and Henry doesn’t pick up where he left off. I just don’t think we’ve done enough there, imo.

Agreed, keep a close eye on who we bring in for visits, interviews, etc... That has a big hand in players we take..

Everybody thought that 'trait' was blown up last year with us taking Rashaan Evans, but Rashaan Evans was on the visits/interviews list.... Coaches gave him an interview at his Pro Day.
 
What we did last year doesnt matter. You have to look at what we need right now. Just the way it is.

I'm adding Cody Ford and his 19 reps to this list though. And since I'm doing that I gotta add the rest of the olineman because ford has better tape than the rest of the class. This O line class just isn't very good, and if we get one it needs to be in the 2nd or later.

Agree with most of this...but while Ford has good tape, so far McCoy has the best tape for me so far. Of the OC's and OG's available...I think McCoy and Bradbury are the most starter ready considering size, strength, movement skills and tape. That said, I'd probably go in another direction and try and get one of them in round 2. I think there are other players who could make it to us at 19 but not much further and some guys we like we might need to move up a few spots for.

But Bradbury would be a guy that matches player, position, and need so I COULD see it happening...but I don't think that's the most likely choice. Think DL, EDGE, WR or TE are more likely.
 
I’m a fan of Brown

Thats a poor way to draft. If this wasn’t such a heavy draft for pass rushers, I’d agree, but I think we can find a very capable guy in the 2nd.

I’m of the opinion that MM isn’t likely to be back next year, we need the offense with a bit of experience if we bring in a new guy.

I like Brown too...just not sure if we'd use him correctly.

In a sense you are both right. What matters last year doesn't matter in terms of, we've drafted x 3 times in a row so we HAVE to go the other side. You draft based on best value/best player matching needs. But you do have to be mindful of contracts and when they come up.

If Mariota isn't back next year and we grab another rookie qb the next year...the rook is gonna go thru some growing pains anyway.
 
I won’t be upset with it.

Like I said, take BPA, and that could easily be a pass rusher. I just think you could snag one in the second round.

I just think it’s a poor strategy to load up so heavily on defense in the draft, and in 4 years you have half your defense leaving or eating up monster contracts. Some balance is good.

We could really be hurting on offense if DW doesn’t come back strong and Henry doesn’t pick up where he left off. I just don’t think we’ve done enough there, imo.

BPA...haven't we gone beyond that now? And if you're saying in your next paragraph its a poor strategy to just load up on D...what if DL is the BPA available every year. Will it work if every 1st and 2nd round pick for 5 years in a row are DL? It doesn't work for any position to put that many resources into it. So we need an adjustment in thinking. BPA does not work.

Not only would we be hurting on offense if he doesn't come back strong, we need another WR, another IOL, and we don't know if Smith will be able to take over for DW in the long term or just be a #2 TE. Plus, giving your QB who got beaten up more protection and more weapons will always HELP!!! And if that's Mariota moving forward or a rookie next year...always good to put them in the best position to succeed.
 
BPA...haven't we gone beyond that now? And if you're saying in your next paragraph its a poor strategy to just load up on D...what if DL is the BPA available every year. Will it work if every 1st and 2nd round pick for 5 years in a row are DL? It doesn't work for any position to put that many resources into it. So we need an adjustment in thinking. BPA does not work.

I mean, you clearly have to have some discrepancy. If there is a run on edge rushers, and we got a guy projected to go in the 2nd who is next on the list, or a top 10 guy at another position who slid, who are you going to take?

I sure hope it’s not the edge guy simply because it’s a bigger need.
 
I mean, we saw how bad this team was without Walker last year. Add in the fact that we have no clue how he will recover and how much longer we have with him, TE is definitely an option. I’d say maybe even more than WR. I could easily see us going C/G or a TE over a WR and grabbing a wideout later (hence interviewing deebo samuel)...Naturally, that’s saying we go offense of course...but I agree that interior DL is a huge need.
 
I mean, you clearly have to have some discrepancy. If there is a run on edge rushers, and we got a guy projected to go in the 2nd who is next on the list, or a top 10 guy at another position who slid, who are you going to take?

I sure hope it’s not the edge guy simply because it’s a bigger need.

LOL! Of course not. BPA and Need alone are bad strategies that don't work. Let's take our current situation. We have strong needs at DL, EDGE, WR, IOL and upgrade or near future needs at TE, DL, EDGE and potentially OC, CB, ILB.

You have a plan based on your board...we have 1 DT and 2 EDGE we value as top 5 picks. They go off the board in the top 5. No one falls out of our top 10 group either. Between picks 10-20 we like 2 EDGE, 2 OL, 1 WR, 1 TE and 1 DT. After those guys, our next group of players have 2nd round grades on them so we either want one of these guys or want to trade down.

Let's say we get to pick 15 and only 1 guy is left...you try and see who is likely to take him so you know who you have to jump ahead of...then move up to get him. Or if it's cost prohibitive, you try to trade back to better match taking 2nd round pick graded players with 2nd round picks. The last thing you want to do is take a 2nd round graded player in round 1.

The other option is we get to our pick and we have 1 EDGE, 1 TE, and 1 OL of the group we like. You look at the highest graded player out of that group. If you have them all graded the same, you take either the player you like best, the most scarce position player (if I can get a C almost as good next round but not EDGE, you take the EDGE), or...you see if you can move down 2 spots guaranteeing you still get one of those players and more picks later.

You never just take positional need without matching the value of the draft pick (#19 in round 1) with the grade value. Ideally, we match grade of player with where they get drafted with need of position. Even better if you can do this throughout the draft and cover all your biggest needs at the same time.
 
You eventually have to start getting young skill position players on offense, and I think we are in a pretty good spot to do that at 19.

..... Henry, Corey, Hump, Tajae, Taywan, and Jonnu are all 23-25 years old....
 
..... Henry, Corey, Hump, Tajae, Taywan, and Jonnu are all 23-25 years old....
It took all year for one of those guys to do anything and Hump is on a new team.

Sharpe might not even make the roster.

Hell, Sharpe and Taylor have less than 800 yards and 4 TDS between them. That’s not talent.
 
legitimately, if we draft another Bama player 1st 2 rounds, I'm probably gonna be going around pissing in gas tanks..
 
Brian Burns terrifies me. He looks like Justin Hunter out on the field - tall and super skinny. Dude needs to bulk up, because he needs to add some power to his game or he's going to have a short career.

One thing that really stands out to me watching him, is he does get to the QB a lot but he doesn't get them on the ground immediately. It's like, grab them, spin them around, fall down, pull them down on top of you. That's not going to work in the NFL, especially against QBs like Luck or Roethlisberger who will have completed a TD pass by the time Burns would get them on the ground.

He's definitely one I'm staying away from in the 1st round. He could be a good player if he adds about 20 pounds of muscle, but not a 1st rounder IMO.
 
Yeah I’m not big on burns. I think Jrob and co. Will continue to look for guys NFL ready with production. Wilkins, Ferrel, etc...
 
Brian Burns terrifies me. He looks like Justin Hunter out on the field - tall and super skinny. Dude needs to bulk up, because he needs to add some power to his game or he's going to have a short career.

One thing that really stands out to me watching him, is he does get to the QB a lot but he doesn't get them on the ground immediately. It's like, grab them, spin them around, fall down, pull them down on top of you. That's not going to work in the NFL, especially against QBs like Luck or Roethlisberger who will have completed a TD pass by the time Burns would get them on the ground.

He's definitely one I'm staying away from in the 1st round. He could be a good player if he adds about 20 pounds of muscle, but not a 1st rounder IMO.

yeah, I actually watched him laslt night.... seems he's so adamant about trying to hot foot his way to the qb, that he just lets rbs dance on by.
 
Brian Burns terrifies me. He looks like Justin Hunter out on the field - tall and super skinny. Dude needs to bulk up, because he needs to add some power to his game or he's going to have a short career.

One thing that really stands out to me watching him, is he does get to the QB a lot but he doesn't get them on the ground immediately. It's like, grab them, spin them around, fall down, pull them down on top of you. That's not going to work in the NFL, especially against QBs like Luck or Roethlisberger who will have completed a TD pass by the time Burns would get them on the ground.

He's definitely one I'm staying away from in the 1st round. He could be a good player if he adds about 20 pounds of muscle, but not a 1st rounder IMO.

The problem is...his combination of athleticism and skills is top 10. He is a Danielle Hunter clone. If we project him as the next Danielle hunter, I think we'd all be ecstatic. Problem is...can he add even MORE weight and strength and keep during an NFL season? The fact that he bulked up to 249 and still put on a combine shows makes me think yes. And his ability to get a low angle arc running around the tackle is as good as anyone...and that includes Josh Allen. We won't find a guy in round 2 who has such an explosive first step AND that kind of bend around the arc. Plus, he doesn't has a pretty good spin move and he has a nice inside counter too and shows the ability to slap hands off him. And with his quick feet and twitch, he can make some dynamic plays and SHOULD be a consistent 10+ sack guy. But he'll need to add some bulk...I'd say 10-15lbs and get a lot stronger.

His biggest weaknesses are his anchor and shed vs the run and you don't see him beat people with much of a bull rush in the pass rush. People like to throw around this concept of converting speed to power (Fergasun and Gary come to mind) and it's not really something in his repertoire. If he adds that, he could become better than Hunter. But if his upside is a 14-15 sack a year guy and his floor is an elite situational pass rusher...there are worse things to take at pick 19.

He's definitely on my first round board and quite arguably the 3rd best EDGE pass rusher in the draft (Bosa and Allen).
 
The problem is...his combination of athleticism and skills is top 10. He is a Danielle Hunter clone. If we project him as the next Danielle hunter, I think we'd all be ecstatic. Problem is...can he add even MORE weight and strength and keep during an NFL season? The fact that he bulked up to 249 and still put on a combine shows makes me think yes. And his ability to get a low angle arc running around the tackle is as good as anyone...and that includes Josh Allen. We won't find a guy in round 2 who has such an explosive first step AND that kind of bend around the arc. Plus, he doesn't has a pretty good spin move and he has a nice inside counter too and shows the ability to slap hands off him. And with his quick feet and twitch, he can make some dynamic plays and SHOULD be a consistent 10+ sack guy. But he'll need to add some bulk...I'd say 10-15lbs and get a lot stronger.

His biggest weaknesses are his anchor and shed vs the run and you don't see him beat people with much of a bull rush in the pass rush. People like to throw around this concept of converting speed to power (Fergasun and Gary come to mind) and it's not really something in his repertoire. If he adds that, he could become better than Hunter. But if his upside is a 14-15 sack a year guy and his floor is an elite situational pass rusher...there are worse things to take at pick 19.

He's definitely on my first round board and quite arguably the 3rd best EDGE pass rusher in the draft (Bosa and Allen).
is he a Daniele Hunter clone or a Leonard Floyd?

Draft spot answers that question unfortunately
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top