- Thread starter
- #261
Wish we had him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wish we had himWorth it to the Seahawks
I agree but the Hawks will be cash strappedWish we had him
And he will be a pro bowler this season
Doubtful.. no team over the past decade as fewer players in the Pro Bowl than the Patriots.And he will be a pro bowler this season
Cause they're in the superbowl every yearDoubtful.. no team over the past decade as fewer players in the Pro Bowl than the Patriots.
Mariota shockingly bad at scrambling and dealing with pressure, considering his a athleticism. While Allen turned a ton of pressure into 50+ rushing yards per game from scrambling
That's bold coming from a guy defending a 24 TD/23 INT QB heading into year 5.
That was posted like two weeks ago.
Originally posted 2 weeks ago but copy and pasted daily.That was posted like two weeks ago.
Originally posted 2 weeks ago but copy and pasted daily.
It's like parrots with verbal diarrhea around here at times.
I read an article yesterday that the Titans probably won't sign Suh, definitely won't get him in for a visit because we know what he brings. Also visited with him last year.Yeah, it seems no matter what thread I'm in, I see the same whining.
Anyone think Suh or Wilkerson get signed BEFORE the draft?
I'm out on Suh. I'd rather have a young player in the draft who has potential, even if it's a mid rounder. Suh was fine last year, but nothing special, and he would cost far too much to be worth what he would give us.I read an article yesterday that the Titans probably won't sign Suh, definitely won't get him in for a visit because we know what he brings. Also visited with him last year.
I'd like that signing but not sure if it will happen.
They will probably get signed after the draft, once teams figure out what the draft brings.
I agree with Suh costing too much, I'd like Suh and a rookie, Casey would benefit more with a vet until the rookie is up to speed.I'm out on Suh. I'd rather have a young player in the draft who has potential, even if it's a mid rounder. Suh was fine last year, but nothing special, and he would cost far too much to be worth what he would give us.
I'm out on Suh. I'd rather have a young player in the draft who has potential, even if it's a mid rounder. Suh was fine last year, but nothing special, and he would cost far too much to be worth what he would give us.
ive been saying this for a while. we could also go ansah or wilkerson and give them 2-3 years to really give us some cushionWhile he's expensive, you get the equivalent play of a 1st round DT (that we could take between 15 and 19) while at the same time drafting another position...giving us DOUBLE the impact. While it's not a long term solution, it is our best shot at getting the most bang for our buck (and draft) this year.
Not at all ... Because they have 1 or 2 superstars and just a bunch of guys who play well in the system. They don’t get guys selected period.Cause they're in the superbowl every year