Guest viewing is limited

Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA

Status
Not open for further replies.
You might want to watch again. #71 throws his hands up asking for the flag as soon as the takedown happens. A flag would have been thrown. Not sure why you are arguing this point.
But not because it was dirty. He pulled the ole’ WR cry about a penalty and didn’t get it proving my point even more that there was no penalty to be called AND the ref had more than enough time to drop it if he felt it was.
 
But not because it was dirty. He pulled the ole’ WR cry about a penalty and didn’t get it proving my point even more that there was no penalty to be called AND the ref had more than enough time to drop it if he felt it was.
See my above edit
 
You can also see that Garrett was done and turning away with Rudolph’s helmet in hand until Rudolph came charging in again.

Ridiculous to think that Rudolph wasn’t the large portion of the escalation. Garrett went way overboard by swinging the helmet but this fight was picked by Rudolph, no question.
 
You might want to watch again. #71 throws his hands up asking for the flag as soon as the takedown happens. A flag would have been thrown. Not sure why you are arguing this point.

I also don’t see a flag thrown when Garrett hits Rudolph with the helmet, nor when Pouncey is beating on Garrett.
What would be the point then, at that point it looked like it was done, when Garrett turns away from Rudolph. When Rudolph charges afterwards, this is like a new fight after the game is completely over.

The point is that Rudolph was mad, decastro can wave his hands for a flag all day, the league has made weaker calls than that, so why not complain I guess. Bottom line, it wasn’t a penalty.
 
What would be the point then, at that point it looked like it was done, when Garrett turns away from Rudolph. When Rudolph charges afterwards, this is like a new fight after the game is completely over.

The point is that Rudolph was mad, decastro can wave his hands for a flag all day, the league has made weaker calls than that, so why not complain I guess. Bottom line, it wasn’t a penalty.
We will never know, will we? Everything escalated too quickly. Bottom line is you cannot definitively say that it wasn’t a penalty. I can say that a hit like that would be called a penalty in every instance over the past 5 seasons.
 
We will never know, will we? Everything escalated too quickly. Bottom line is you cannot definitively say that it wasn’t a penalty. I can say that a hit like that would be called a penalty in every instance over the past 5 seasons.
I agree those have been called before and generally have fans disagreeing with the call but what I was saying is there was no intention by the ref to throw a flag on that particular play.
Fans can disagree on if it should have been but it was called a no penalty.
 
We will never know, will we? Everything escalated too quickly. Bottom line is you cannot definitively say that it wasn’t a penalty. I can say that a hit like that would be called a penalty in every instance over the past 5 seasons.

uhh ........ bottom line is that yeah you CAN say it wasn’t a penalty because the guys who decide declined to call one.

and you can’t validate your statement that every hit like that was called in the past 5 years.
 
It would be super odd. It would be the first documented ref that chose to intervene between players before dropping the flag if he felt it was flag worthy.

He had plenty of time to throw it, watch the video again on how slow the “tackle” on Rudolph was. You can also see the lack of reaction by the ref as it’s happening and the 2 OL because no one thought the take down was dirty.

After on the ground, Rudolph starts pulling at the back/bottom of Garrett’s helmet.

There are 2 posted videos in this thread that show all of this.

Not really. The initial hit was fine. No ref would have an issue with that. Even the twisting around would have been ok if he eventually let him go. The ref would not have an issue with that either. The issue is when he finishes the tackle and he lands on top of him. That was absolutely roughing the passer by the book, but immediately after they hit the ground, Mason starts pulling and grabbing at Garrett's helmet. There was at most 2 full seconds between the time they hit the ground and when the Ref started breaking up the fight.

And let's remember, refs miss calls all the time. So just because it isn't called doesn't mean it shouldn't have.
 
Separately, what does the fine at another point in time prove? Completely irrelevant to this case.

For one, Garrett doesn't get the benefit of the doubt when he's developed a history as a dirty player.

Secondly, players remember these events. You don't think Mason wasn't keenly aware Garrett ended Seimian's season due to a late hit?
 
I watched the Siemian hit a few times. I'm fine with that being a penalty and the injury is unfortunate, but it looks like a football play. He puts his head down before the ball comes out and is half a step to 1 step too late.

Are we at the point where we call anyone that gets a pre-snap penalty a cheater?
 
Myles has a dirty history of doing this too much

and that is relevant to this incident how?

You just admit that you're biased with a statement such as that.

Has NO bearing on whether Rudolph and others have some culpability in this incident.
 
Garrett got what he deserved, but Rudolph should have been given at least a one game suspension, along with a fine as well.
 
and that is relevant to this incident how?

You just admit that you're biased with a statement such as that.

Has NO bearing on whether Rudolph and others have some culpability in this incident.
Im not biased at all towards him

The guy starts stuff all the time, simple as that. The extra stuff is what got Rudolph going after him to begin with
 
Not really. The initial hit was fine. No ref would have an issue with that. Even the twisting around would have been ok if he eventually let him go. The ref would not have an issue with that either. The issue is when he finishes the tackle and he lands on top of him. That was absolutely roughing the passer by the book, but immediately after they hit the ground, Mason starts pulling and grabbing at Garrett's helmet. There was at most 2 full seconds between the time they hit the ground and when the Ref started breaking up the fight.

And let's remember, refs miss calls all the time. So just because it isn't called doesn't mean it shouldn't have.
You need to rewatch the “tackle”. Garrett doesn’t even land on top of him. Rudolph is pulled down on top of Garrett then kind of rolls to the side where Rudolph is reaching around Garrett’s helmet to pull it off. He pulled hard enough that Garrett’s helmet almost came off, Thanos gauntlet style, when “quill” aka decastro pulls Garrett back.

In general, that would be a tricky tack roughing penalty and if called, fans would have used that as just another “NFL is too soft” argument. Weak penalty at best and I’m glad the refs had no intention of calling it.
 
For one, Garrett doesn't get the benefit of the doubt when he's developed a history as a dirty player.

Secondly, players remember these events. You don't think Mason wasn't keenly aware Garrett ended Seimian's season due to a late hit?
No. Not at all do I think Rudolph was even remotely thinking about that. I think he was pissed that he got sacked the 2 plays before that one and got take. Down for a third straight play on what equaled a super s***ty night for him. He was frustrated and tried to pick a fight. He lost.
 
Im not biased at all towards him

The guy starts stuff all the time, simple as that. The extra stuff is what got Rudolph going after him to begin with
That may be true, just not in this instance.
Who knows if there was verbal crap throughout the game or even on that play. The play itself by Garrett was fine and nothing noteworthy until Rudolph started his hissy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top