- Thread starter
- #81
How the heck are the Jags going to lose enough games with Minshew at QB to get Lawrence anyway? IMO the Jags are a legit team.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
Guest viewing is limited
- You have a limited number of page views remaining
- 4 guest views remaining
- Register now to remove this limitation
-
Come place your wages using your HFBM Moola on UFC 307 outcomes.
Early Prelims close at 5:30pm central, Prelims at 7pm central, Main Cards at 9pm central and title fights at 10pm. Place your wages at https://www.hfbmboards.com/bookie/ufc/ -
SEC Football Week 5 wages live at https://www.hfbmboards.com/bookie/sec/. Wagers close at start of each game
-
Wagers live for todays game 1's in the NLDS and ALDS at https://www.hfbmboards.com/bookie/mlb/. Wagers close at start of each game
-
Place your wagers for NHL games on Tuesday Oct 8th https://www.hfbmboards.com/bookie/nhl/wagers close start of each game
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA
- Thread starter archived
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
How the heck are the Jags going to lose enough games with Minshew at QB to get Lawrence anyway? IMO the Jags are a legit team.
- Thread starter
- #82
I think most people thought they would tank before actually watching them this year. I doubt anyone feels that way now.How the heck are the Jags going to lose enough games with Minshew at QB to get Lawrence anyway? IMO the Jags are a legit team.
- Thread starter
- #84
I think most people thought they would tank before actually watching them this year. I doubt anyone feels that way now.
I don't think the Jags are still a good overall team, their defense is young and offensive to the eyes. Offense is still gelling. I still see them as 7-9 this year, but they aren't tanking.
Which I hate the concept of taking to begin with. I will never ever root for my team to lose. I just can't. :gaah:
- Thread starter
- #85
This.Notable injuries from Sunday's Week 2 games
Insane injuries today.
Glad we got the W , thankful we didn't have more injuries ...
I cannot remember a single week with more impactful injuries across the league. Very grateful we did not have any (more) injuries.
- Thread starter
- #86
Agreed on all accounts. Still a little concerned with the run blocking as well as Henry's aggressiveness though.Just watched the game.
Good news... Tanehill ain't regressing. He's growing. We got ourselves a QB.
Bad news, so does Jax.
Great to see Smith and Davis stepping up with brown out. Pass pro was good today.
Defense needs to get healthy and get fit. If we do, we can play with anyone in this league.
- Thread starter
- #87
Tannehill is the real deal and I am encouraged by the fact that we can win games when the running game isn't dominating.
The defense looks bad so far IMO. Robinson didn't add enough pass rushers this offseason. I actually think we should add someone at the deadline.
The defense looks bad so far IMO. Robinson didn't add enough pass rushers this offseason. I actually think we should add someone at the deadline.
- Thread starter
- #88
Dude, we added Clowney and Beasley... this is just a product of a shortened offseason and some new pieces and a new DC. We have some key injuries to get past. It will be fine.Tannehill is the real deal and I am encouraged by the fact that we can win games when the running game isn't dominating.
The defense looks bad so far IMO. Robinson didn't add enough pass rushers this offseason. I actually think we should add someone at the deadline.
- Thread starter
- #89
Vaccaro was the only one I actually noticed yesterday doing anythingCan we please fast track AJAX to coming back....
Also, you might see us take a SS next year - Vaccaro can't cover a TE for anything.
- Thread starter
- #90
He had one of the best games I'd seen him have. Def the best player on the field for the Titans D yesterday.Vaccaro was the only one I actually noticed yesterday doing anything
- Thread starter
- #91
Tannehill is the real deal and I am encouraged by the fact that we can win games when the running game isn't dominating.
The defense looks bad so far IMO. Robinson didn't add enough pass rushers this offseason. I actually think we should add someone at the deadline.
Beasley hasn't played yet.
- Thread starter
- #93
What's up with Henry? Is it him or the line, or both? It looked like the left side, Saffold specifically, had a bad game. But it almost looks like Henry is running like he did before he had his talk with Eddie. Do we need to get Eddie back on the phone?
- Thread starter
- #94
What's up with Henry? Is it him or the line, or both? It looked like the left side, Saffold specifically, had a bad game. But it almost looks like Henry is running like he did before he had his talk with Eddie. Do we need to get Eddie back on the phone?
I don't see anything wrong with Henry....2 games in just under 200 yards, and on pace for 1500 plus yards. Teams are stacking the line, and we continue to get positive yards in the running game....and that leaves Tannehill plenty of options in the passing game. Also lets not forget Henry dominates in the second half of the season and playoffs....the offense is looking really good and way ahead of last year at seasons start....the D looks shaky however I'm confident they will pull it together.
- Thread starter
- #95
The line isn’t dominant in their run blocking, especially on the right. Henry isn’t hitting the hole with authority consistently either. I know Henry will get in his groove soon, but not sure about the line.What's up with Henry? Is it him or the line, or both? It looked like the left side, Saffold specifically, had a bad game. But it almost looks like Henry is running like he did before he had his talk with Eddie. Do we need to get Eddie back on the phone?
- Thread starter
- #96
I think that has something to do with the line. He doesn’t look quite as confident going for it. I get why they didn’t re-sign Conk, but we should have went after better than Kelly when drafting a raw prospect behind him. It would be nice if we could get Wilson in for some of those run plays then spell him...He’s a real big kid. Train him with run blocking and worst case, he becomes a stud guard.The line isn’t dominant in their run blocking, especially on the right. Henry isn’t hitting the hole with authority consistently either. I know Henry will get in his groove soon, but not sure about the line.
- Thread starter
- #99
He had one of the best games I'd seen him have. Def the best player on the field for the Titans D yesterday.
Agreed. I’d argue he’s played better so far this year than Byard.
- Thread starter
- #100
It's just gameplan. Teams are choosing to take him away and daring Tannehill to beat them. And hes doing it.What's up with Henry? Is it him or the line, or both? It looked like the left side, Saffold specifically, had a bad game. But it almost looks like Henry is running like he did before he had his talk with Eddie. Do we need to get Eddie back on the phone?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
