- Thread starter
- #801
I don't think we have enough this year and personally trading next year's isn't a good idea especially if we want to move up next year for a QB ...I think Tannehill gets this yearYou can trade up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think we have enough this year and personally trading next year's isn't a good idea especially if we want to move up next year for a QB ...I think Tannehill gets this yearYou can trade up.
Tannehill will be cut next year. We have to do something this year. I'm not a fan of using our first on a qb.I don't think we have enough this year and personally trading next year's isn't a good idea especially if we want to move up next year for a QB ...I think Tannehill gets this year
I think this decision will based on how he plays this year. To keep him one more year (after this year) won’t be nearly as costly. Pending the draft, if a QB is picked, especially one that needs some development, THill would be ok for another year.Tannehill will be cut next year. We have to do something this year. I'm not a fan of using our first on a qb.
And you think there is a QB in Rd2 this year to replace Tannehill next year?Tannehill will be cut next year. We have to do something this year. I'm not a fan of using our first on a qb.
We will owe him 40 million next year. Just don't see the Titans paying that when they have an outAnd you think there is a QB in Rd2 this year to replace Tannehill next year?
This is Tannehill's prove it year, I agree if he sucks he's gone but if he bounces back? And a Tannehill bounce back would be don't lose games for the team.
2 ways out.We will owe him 40 million next year. Just don't see the Titans paying that when they have an out
Hell No to NewtonIf we don’t draft a QB, what would you think of signing Fitzpatrick or Newton?
No to both...they aren't any better than Tannehill at this pointIf we don’t draft a QB, what would you think of signing Fitzpatrick or Newton?
Cincy did something like this drafting AJ Green in the 1st and Dalton in the 2nd. I don't think they traded though. It worked out well, considering the odds of actually winning a SB.yep kinda a head scratcher....only thing I could see would be to give up next yrs 1st which I wouldn't be willing to do...
also you don't take WR in the 1st and then trade next yrs 1st to get a QB in the 2nd rnd because you miss out on the extra contract years that the 1st rnd gives you. Just draft your QB in the 1st
You can't under value those extra yrs and that is why I only trade back into the 2nd rnd if someone is willing to overpay and all my guys are already off the board.
Fitzpatrick:beerbang:If we don’t draft a QB, what would you think of signing Fitzpatrick or Newton?
Fitzpatrick really?Fitzpatrick:beerbang:
Newtonuke:
I don’t think there’s any interest in signing Fitzpatrick.Fitzpatrick really?
No to Newton for sure
To be honest I'd rather just roll with Woodside if something were to happen to Tannehill...they've kept him around there must be something the FO sees??
No to both...they aren't any better than Tannehill at this point
Not saying I would want him but it will be interesting to see what Cleveland does with Mayfield....18 million is alot for a backup ....if Watson is suspended he'll stay there.They are quite a bit worse.
Newton is done and Fitzpatrick is 63 years old.
Not saying I would want him but it will be interesting to see what Cleveland does with Mayfield....18 million is alot for a backup ....if Watson is suspended he'll stay there.
Newton is beyond worn out. He only had one really decent year anyway.No to both...they aren't any better than Tannehill at this point
I say roll with Woodside...address WR and OLNewton is beyond worn out. He only had one really decent year anyway.