- Thread starter
- #781
Funny how fast people turned on Tannehill. Now they act like they hated him from the start.Subjective.
There are teams with worse QBs than THill, there are teams with better cap situations too.
I suppose teams that have a cheaper “mariota” for example, aren’t pissed because they spent a lot of money on him but they certainly won’t be competitive either.
as I posted earlier, it seems like we have people willing to spend woodside money on QB but forget you’re going to get woodside play.
The argument in that part is how “overpaid” is THill?
how overpaid are QBs in general?
How come none of these complaints came out about THill until after he got the contract? I don’t mean the money either, most of the board here was not just content with the extension but pleased to keep him because of his first 2 years of play in Tennessee.
most of this entire argument is based on the fickleness of 2 playoff games.
I said Tanny was a lateral move from Mariota when we got him. He changed my mind and now I've got to defend him against the very people who were so pumped to get him. Lol
As far as the contract goes, they'll rework it or something before they take a huge hit...that's how it works.