Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Definitely not.
but let’s make sure we got your talking points straight you said:
“I was assured Tanne still had it.”
-subjective on what “it” is, but I’ll sign that. I did say he was still capable.
“I was assured if we got him weapons he'd be back to playing like he did in 2020.”
-not sure who said this, but given some weapons, reasonable to assume we see a safer version. He only threw 7 INTs that year.
“I was assured QB was the last thing we needed this past draft”
-was this even about THill for the people who said they didn’t want to see them take a QB? Plenty argued against the options of QB to draft. And gaurentee no one said QB was the “last thing” needed. It just wasn’t the first.
For all that went wrong yesterday, I thought this was the right call. We hadn't moved the ball all game and I had no confidence in our team to pick up the yards we needed to convert. It was a struggle all day long just trying to pick up yards. Kicking just put us behind by 1 point. Vrabes thought his defense could get us the ball back - which I think was a safer bet with how the game was going, than putting it all on one play with the offense.I still can’t get over Vrabel becoming “safe” and “conservative” with the decision to kick a field goal instead of going for it on 4th down. It proved his lack of confidence in our offense and probably lost us the game.
He cut off his manhood balls included after the AFC championship appearance.I still can’t get over Vrabel becoming “safe” and “conservative” with the decision to kick a field goal instead of going for it on 4th down. It proved his lack of confidence in our offense and probably lost us the game.
Tanny to busy forcing the ball to Hopkins. He sticks to his first read and if it's not there he forces the pass or the ghosts get him and he takes a sack.There is a ton to be disappointed and frustrated about from yesterday's game. But one thing I didn't see anyone mention - Where was Treylon Burks? This guy is a 1st round WR, had I think one catch and a big drop. He's got to do better getting open and making plays. He was invisible yesterday.
Now I know you’re speaking for the minority. Very few wanted to “tank” mostly because tanking is stupid and a proven failure of a strategy.When I have time I'll look. I know for a fact I argued endlessly against all these points. And specifically regarding the draft, several of us wanted to move on from Tanne, by any means necessary. But mostly, we wanted to trade him for whatever we can get, tank this season, and draft Caleb Williams/Drake Maye next year. This team lacked a lot of talent on offense and didn't do much to address it this off-season.
Your last point is what makes the first so unbelievable. In the context of the game, analytics don’t fit. There was no way Tannehill was going to get a first down and score. The field goal gave the best chance. However, you know what would have given the Titans the absolute best chance to win? Feed Henry!!!!!!Somebody posted it but the analytics said they had a higher chance of winning the game by going for it on that 4th down. I guess so much for the new analytics huh Vrabes? Mike Herndon said it best as well. He made a decision relying on his defense then turned around and then made the opposite another decision the next time. Consistency.
Also, important to note. Henry was out snapped by Spears.
my initial thoughts as well... BUT I pivoted to if Titans failed on 4th down would have left saints backed up and D was supposed to hold giving Titans a short field to go for the winFor all that went wrong yesterday, I thought this was the right call. We hadn't moved the ball all game and I had no confidence in our team to pick up the yards we needed to convert. It was a struggle all day long just trying to pick up yards. Kicking just put us behind by 1 point. Vrabes thought his defense could get us the ball back - which I think was a safer bet with how the game was going, than putting it all on one play with the offense.
From what I’ve heard;Has anyone posted the snap counts yet? I am bery interested to see Derrick Henry's. I just want confirmation its not my ego tellin me "new oc same problem" and that it is indeed a fact he barely saw the field in the second half. Spears was out there way more than he was
Henry had 15 total carries, 5 in the second half, 4 were 4th qtr.Has anyone posted the snap counts yet? I am bery interested to see Derrick Henry's. I just want confirmation its not my ego tellin me "new oc same problem" and that it is indeed a fact he barely saw the field in the second half. Spears was out there way more than he was
It doesn't matter how badly the QB is playing, you don't give the other team the ball while losing with 2:30 left in today's NFL. It seems like the big dick Vrabel who went for the wins vs the Eagles and Chargers in 2018 is gone.Your last point is what makes the first so unbelievable. In the context of the game, analytics don’t fit. There was no way Tannehill was going to get a first down and score. The field goal gave the best chance. However, you know what would have given the Titans the absolute best chance to win? Feed Henry!!!!!!
I’m not really arguing that the FG was the right move. What I’m pointing out is that playing it safe makes zero sense when forcing a passing attack, that wasn’t working, all second half only to admit it won’t work at that moment.It doesn't matter how badly the QB is playing, you don't give the other team the ball while losing with 2:30 left in today's NFL. It seems like the big dick Vrabel who went for the wins vs the Eagles and Chargers in 2018 is gone.