- Thread starter
- #41
Afc46...
Why do you eliminate polian's previous 12 years as a GM before coming to the colts? Because it doesn't suit your silly arguement? And why in the hell would this entire issue pertain to only your critera?
For starters reese was GM for the oilers for 3 years before polian took over the colts. Does that mean that if the colts make it to the super bowl in the next three years your arguement is invalid?
How are you with math? Polian has been a GM for 20 years. His teams have made the playoffs 13 times or 65%
Reese has been GM for the oilers-titans for 11 years and the team has made 4 playoffs, 36% of the time.
Question, is 65% greater or less than 36%?
In polian's 20 years as GM his tams have been to 4 super bowls. 20% of the time.
In floyd reese's 11 years his teams have been to one super bowl. 9%.
Question, is 20% greater than or less than 9%?
What is so hard to understand about those facts?
Why do you eliminate polian's previous 12 years as a GM before coming to the colts? Because it doesn't suit your silly arguement? And why in the hell would this entire issue pertain to only your critera?
For starters reese was GM for the oilers for 3 years before polian took over the colts. Does that mean that if the colts make it to the super bowl in the next three years your arguement is invalid?
How are you with math? Polian has been a GM for 20 years. His teams have made the playoffs 13 times or 65%
Reese has been GM for the oilers-titans for 11 years and the team has made 4 playoffs, 36% of the time.
Question, is 65% greater or less than 36%?
In polian's 20 years as GM his tams have been to 4 super bowls. 20% of the time.
In floyd reese's 11 years his teams have been to one super bowl. 9%.
Question, is 20% greater than or less than 9%?
What is so hard to understand about those facts?