- Thread starter
- #1,421
Yeppers. Old "Run the same play until it works" Robiskie was fired because of MM8.
That guy was SPECIAL.
How they somehow had the best built offense for him is something of wonder tho....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeppers. Old "Run the same play until it works" Robiskie was fired because of MM8.
That guy was SPECIAL.
And you think Mike Tomlin should still be a HC? Did Chuck Pagano get a chance at the same position? Which team is Mike McCarthy currently a HC of? All of these coaches eventually get figured out. A great QB usually masks their flaws and gives them a longer leash, while the bad ones expedite the processI'm pretty sure that our HCs and OCs got themselves fired. I don't believe that they got a chance elsewhere at the same position after leaving Tennessee.
You know they had to do something. Jrob and vrabel are both still trying to keep their jobs.Umm, then why did we add Tanny?
Id agree with your post 100% if we stayed with gabbert/some other loser. but trading for tanny suggests theyre in win now mode, with or without mary
I dont believe either if them are tied to Mary. They came in after him, they will get to draft a QB before Amy fires anyoneYou know they had to do something. Jrob and vrabel are both still trying to keep their jobs.
Did Pittsburgh go through 3 complete turnovers in the HC/OC positions in the last 4 years?And you think Mike Tomlin should still be a HC? Did Chuck Pagano get a chance at the same position? Which team is Mike McCarthy currently a HC of? All of these coaches eventually get figured out. A great QB usually masks their flaws and gives them a longer leash, while the bad ones expedite the process
Yeah I can see your argument. That’s just my opinion on the situation.I dont believe either if them are tied to Mary. They came in after him, they will get to draft a QB before Amy fires anyone
The only people doubting that are either jaded, bone heads, or trolling for attention.
And a better passer.The only people doubting that are either jaded, bone heads, or trolling for attention.
Tannehill is not the answer.
He's the same QB, only older.
Greg Cossel said that his biggest issues shouldn't be present after 5 years, no matter the turnover at the coaching positionsDid Pittsburgh go through 3 complete turnovers in the HC/OC positions in the last 4 years?
If not, then my point is valid.
Meh. Brees’s worst seasons were the first two as a starter. He continued to improve from there. His questions weren’t performance based. Only question for him was an injury.D. Brees in San Diego had a similar experience ... Look at him now
Meh. Brees’s worst seasons were the first two as a starter. He continued to improve from there. His questions weren’t performance based. Only question for him was an injury.
It's all good :cool2:If I did, it wasn't on purpose. Lol
Man, if Mariota has a season like Brees’s last two in SD, we’d be doing back flips.I lived in San Diego at the time, I'm just going off of memory. The chargers drafted E. Manning (later traded to NY Giants for P. Rivers) because of his injuries and performance. I remember most of the fans calling him a "Bust" and couldn't wait to move on from him.
Because mariota looks like he's running into a wall far too often against preseason defenses who really haven't game planner as of how to stop him. While Tannehill looks like he could, given the circumstances.Why do you 2 constantly go at it about Mariota? I just don't get it.
You have your positive opinions on Mariota and he has his negatives opinions on Mariota. Why continue to go at it back and forth?
You quoted that dumbass who said Tannehill was 2/29 in practice. You have no right to criticize anyone.lol you are such a tool