Guest viewing is limited

Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm fine changing the tiebreaker rules right now... we all wanted to last year.

This is just too stupid. Most points scored has to be the tiebreaker. It isn't hard to change. I'm commish of another dynasty league, and ours is set up by points.
 
I'm fine changing the tiebreaker rules right now... we all wanted to last year.

This is just too stupid. Most points scored has to be the tiebreaker. It isn't hard to change. I'm commish of another dynasty league, and ours is set up by points.
I agree it's stupid. But changing it one week before the playoffs doesn't seem right and would likely be asking for drama.

And yes, I say this from my 2nd place throne.
 
Was this (making tiebreakers strictly PF) ever actually officially voted/decided on? If we all agreed that point total was the way to go and it just didn't happen then I don't really have a problem in changing it now. If not though, I think we should just leave it for now and make the change next year. Changing it now will almost certainly alter playoff teams and possibly even who eventually wins the chip, because of seeding.

Really, right now at least, ensc is the one getting screwed significantly by the current setup. He would be in 2nd instead of 4th. RSB and myself would both bump down a spot. 5th-8th would stay the same though as they are already ranked according to PF.

Really @RavensShallBurn I think you and I would be the most in danger of losing a spot by going to a total points tiebreaker. Leveon, JCB, and (to a lesser extent) Crow are all nipping at our heels from a PF standpoint. If we both lose this week and the right teams all win, one of us could easily find ourselves on the outside looking in.
 
This is probably the most insane final week I've ever seen in all my years playing fantasy. Somehow crow (7th) and XO (8th) are not even eliminated from 1st round by contention yet lol.
 
So if I win, and rsb, esnc, and sdm lose, I get a first round bye.

If I lose and grid wins, im out, thats ****ing rough.
Who the hell knows at this point lol. Probably something like that. I still can't wrap my head around the fact that I'm in 2nd and still could miss the playoffs entirely.
 
I'm fine changing the tiebreaker rules right now... we all wanted to last year.

This is just too stupid. Most points scored has to be the tiebreaker. It isn't hard to change. I'm commish of another dynasty league, and ours is set up by points.

I made changes in the off season to what I thought was PF tie breakers. We've def spoken on this but now just isn't the time. Shit end of the stick or not it sets a really bad precedent moving forward.

It will be PF as soon as the season is over. Whatever the mistake was that lead to this is my fault anyways so I'll live with it
 
If you guys would go to the "playoffs" page it explains all the tiebreakers on the left side of the page. :facepalm:

Situation is this was changed in the off season to be something that it's currently not. Rn h2h tie breaks a 1v1 tie, or a 3 way if one of the three has wins over both the others- but if the three in the tie don't have h2h together it goes to PF. - it was all supposed to be pf.
 
Was this (making tiebreakers strictly PF) ever actually officially voted/decided on? If we all agreed that point total was the way to go and it just didn't happen then I don't really have a problem in changing it now. If not though, I think we should just leave it for now and make the change next year. Changing it now will almost certainly alter playoff teams and possibly even who eventually wins the chip, because of seeding.

Really, right now at least, ensc is the one getting screwed significantly by the current setup. He would be in 2nd instead of 4th. RSB and myself would both bump down a spot. 5th-8th would stay the same though as they are already ranked according to PF.

Really @RavensShallBurn I think you and I would be the most in danger of losing a spot by going to a total points tiebreaker. Leveon, JCB, and (to a lesser extent) Crow are all nipping at our heels from a PF standpoint. If we both lose this week and the right teams all win, one of us could easily find ourselves on the outside looking in.

I wouldn't mind missing the playoffs if the tiebreakers were changed to the way we're supposed to have them though. That's how much I want them changed. If somehow the tiebreakers are screwed up again next year during the season, I think we all need to agree on a change even if it's in the final week.

I can't believe I'm even in danger of missing the playoffs altogether. My team has been slumping the past couple weeks. Hauschka missing a PAT could end up costing me the playoffs.

My other dynasty league is somewhat similar to this one. Only three teams have clinched the playoffs. There's a 9-3 team, two 8-4 teams, three 7-5 teams (one is me), and two 6-6 teams.
 
I wouldn't mind missing the playoffs if the tiebreakers were changed to the way we're supposed to have them though. That's how much I want them changed. If somehow the tiebreakers are screwed up again next year during the season, I think we all need to agree on a change even if it's in the final week.

I can't believe I'm even in danger of missing the playoffs altogether. My team has been slumping the past couple weeks. Hauschka missing a PAT could end up costing me the playoffs.

My other dynasty league is somewhat similar to this one. Only three teams have clinched the playoffs. There's a 9-3 team, two 8-4 teams, three 7-5 teams (one is me), and two 6-6 teams.

It'll get changed. Right now could force out the bottom guys all together (would totally change Xo's standing) - while I absolutely agree it needs changed (and I'd benefit significantly if it was right now) - I don't feel it's fair all things considered. Just because we can't foresee it means we should change it last second. I could be booted from the playoffs with a loss... I'm still against doing it before this season is over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top