The season isn’t over. I think we will see contributions from pour rookies, but my point with the fact we are in 1st place is that they weren’t needed.
Please List the teams that are getting strong performances from their entire rookie class please. Then please explain what your overall point is.
You never answered this question
In that case, which year had a worse rookie performance?
The point is, this group of rookies has been bad, probably worst in franchise history.
You think the rookies are "not needed." We have had two OT go down with season ending injuries and you actually think the first round OT has not been needed. Missing one of the starting CBs but the second round CB is not needed lol. This is what you are saying.
Teams getting production out of rookies (which you think does not exist). I will list a few:
- Jags, one of the top rushers in the league is a rookie. He is just one rookie doing well. But the team sucks so...
- Chiefs: who are better than the Titans. Leading rusher is a rookie. Other than their third round pick, their draft has produced more than Titans picks.
- Saints: Even with only 4 draft picks they are getting production. They have a starting C and a solid rotational TE out of the group.
- Seattle: also a good team, picking low. They got a starting OL and some defensive contributors.
- PIT: no first rounder and better than the Titans. They got a good WR, a backup OL who started some games and a rotation LB.
There are more, but I mostly focused on good teams.
Now, answer my question. In which years did the Titans have a group with a worse performance. Since that is the original point.