- Thread starter
- #41
That's a little short-sighted.We spend 21 million on Clowney and Beasley...yes hindsight but I'd rather have paid Conklin
$21m....in 2020. And that's it. Both were one-year deals. Re-signing Conklin would have been a long-term deal, which he frankly wasn't worth. Kelly is playing fine at half the price.
I would have been fine with picking up Conklin's fifth-year option before the 2019 season and keeping him this one last year and was actually a little surprised they didn't. A long-term deal though? No thanks.