- Thread starter
- #221
Hard to win without a QBCan’t really say that until next year. But my point is It’s hard to retain core players when a QB makes that much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hard to win without a QBCan’t really say that until next year. But my point is It’s hard to retain core players when a QB makes that much.
It would be hilarious if we traded for Rodgers and the keys to the car get swiped from Tannehill. I'd feel bad for Tanny, but it would absolutely be the right move no questions asked, and no excuses.
Hard to win without a QB
Julio is a Hall of Famer first ballot! Corey Davis is an average nfl wr
Give me the hall of fame WR later in his career over the WR who has never eclipsed 1,000 yards receiving.
Y’all spent years complaining about Corey’s production and now you’d rather sign him to the same contract as Julio Jones? Lol some of y’all on here are absolutely WILD.
1 2nd this year and a swap of 4th for 6th next year is not “a lot” in draft capital.We are not evaluating them as 22 year olds. One is 32 and the other is 26. What is so hard to understand about that?
One could have been retained without giving up draft picks. the other cost us a lot in draft capital.
You do not even understand the most basic elements involved here.
Can’t really say that until next year. But my point is It’s hard to retain core players when a QB makes that much.
We are not evaluating them as 22 year olds. One is 32 and the other is 26. What is so hard to understand about that?
One could have been retained without giving up draft picks. the other cost us a lot in draft capital.
You do not even understand the most basic elements involved here.
Tannehill will be paid top 5 QB money in 2022. More than Russel Wilson and Mahomes. Geez
...
To even consider Corey in the same universe as Julio is ridiculous.
...
We are not evaluating them as 22 year olds. One is 32 and the other is 26. What is so hard to understand about that?
One could have been retained without giving up draft picks. the other cost us a lot in draft capital.
You do not even understand the most basic elements involved here.
We are not evaluating them as 22 year olds. One is 32 and the other is 26. What is so hard to understand about that?
One could have been retained without giving up draft picks. the other cost us a lot in draft capital.
You do not even understand the most basic elements involved here.
It's not the same contract the cap hit is the same. Corey's deal with the Jets was not expensive.
If we have to restructure to make room for Julio, then it doesn't matter. Someone has to restructure, which means someone is gonna get paid a lot more than they should over the next 1-2 years. The options were basically Tanne or some combination of two guys from Henry/Lewan/Saffold, since just restructuring one of those guys likely wouldn't free up enough money.
Personally, I'd rather pay Tanne near 40 million for the next couple of seasons than the guarantee Lewan or Saffold a bunch of money for the next 2 seasos. Lewan didn't perform like an elite tackle this year before his injury and while Saffold is a quality, he's 30 and can be replaced with someone cheaper.
What the heck are you talking about? That is the CAP hit. His pay per year did not change on average. Geez.
We are not evaluating them as 22 year olds. One is 32 and the other is 26. What is so hard to understand about that?
One could have been retained without giving up draft picks. the other cost us a lot in draft capital.
You do not even understand the most basic elements involved here.