- Thread starter
- #61
Yes, all people good at their job were great the second they got the job...He was in the nfl 12 years before his he was oc lol. Is he magically ready in year 15?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, all people good at their job were great the second they got the job...He was in the nfl 12 years before his he was oc lol. Is he magically ready in year 15?
I’m not sure he is ready now either. But he was not ready for sure in Raiderland. It was more on Del Rio than Downing as Jack fired a guy who was doing it right in Musgrave. Dumb move.He was in the nfl 12 years before his he was oc lol. Is he magically ready in year 15?
I'm side stepping facts? Youre the one ignoring that downing took a top 5 offence and made them a bottom 10 offence aand cost del Rio his job lol.
When the offense stinks next year what the excuse?
Titans have become an attractive spot for players and coaches. I mean, the last 2 OC's we've had have went on to be a HC.
I don't care what anyone says, we had our pick at a good DC and OC. Why we hired within baffles the hell out of me.
Our window of opportunity is open for us right now. We need to take full advantage of it and not waste it on Bowen and Downing. There's no doubt Vrabel had better candidates more qualified.
I guess Vrabel doesn't want anymore of his coordinators to be HC candidates and win a SB before he does.
Titans have become an attractive spot for players and coaches. I mean, the last 2 OC's we've had have went on to be a HC.
I don't care what anyone says, we had our pick at a good DC and OC. Why we hired within baffles the hell out of me.
Our window of opportunity is open for us right now. We need to take full advantage of it and not waste it on Bowen and Downing. There's no doubt Vrabel had better candidates more qualified.
I guess Vrabel doesn't want anymore of his coordinators to be HC candidates and win a SB before he does.
Its interesting to see Vrabel make two safe, risk averse choices.It’s an underwhelming pick, but it isn’t a bad pick for OC. Vrabel could have done a lot worse in my opinion. The more I think of this, the more I tend to believe is that it is what Vrabel thought was the safe choice due to continuity probably being paramount.
I don’t see Bowen as risk averse. Keeping him was a huge risk.Its interesting to see Vrabel make two safe, risk averse choices.
You'd think a guy who likes to take a lot of risky 4th down plays would maybe throw caution to the wind a bit more with his OC/DC selections.
Fair, and I agree. I commented somewhere else that Vrabels job comes into question in 12 months now, if the defence stays the same.I don’t see Bowen as risk averse. Keeping him was a huge risk.
Although he occasionally flips the script entirely and goes more conservative than Jeff Fisher. Note the 4th and 2 punt.Its interesting to see Vrabel make two safe, risk averse choices.
You'd think a guy who likes to take a lot of risky 4th down plays would maybe throw caution to the wind a bit more with his OC/DC selections.
The O stays the same or improves with Downing, as it should.Fair, and I agree. I commented somewhere else that Vrabels job comes into question in 12 months now, if the defence stays the same.