- Thread starter
- #401
I think the 2 biggest things to look in for these candidates are:
1. What is their network? Do they have a good base of people they can use to mentor them and build a staff (and replace that staff if they have success). Do they use that network effectively? Are they strong leaders?
2. What is their current philosphy/strategy and how effectively were they able to execute that strategy? How well did the players buy in? How did they handle adversity? (Injuries, adjustments by opponents etc,)
If that's the criteria, given what I cam find out about these guys (and that info is limited and should be taken with a grain of salt), Callahan would probably get top scores on those score sheets.
2nd tier would be Ben Johnson, Macdonald and Slowic. Probably in that order, and probably all good choices. They all seem very competent and capable and have clear signs of being good in at least 1 of the 2 categories mentioned.
All the other candidates seem to have some pretty big question marks in at least one of the categories. Doesn't mean they would fail, but you have to set some interview criteria otherwise you're just "going with your gut."
1. What is their network? Do they have a good base of people they can use to mentor them and build a staff (and replace that staff if they have success). Do they use that network effectively? Are they strong leaders?
2. What is their current philosphy/strategy and how effectively were they able to execute that strategy? How well did the players buy in? How did they handle adversity? (Injuries, adjustments by opponents etc,)
If that's the criteria, given what I cam find out about these guys (and that info is limited and should be taken with a grain of salt), Callahan would probably get top scores on those score sheets.
2nd tier would be Ben Johnson, Macdonald and Slowic. Probably in that order, and probably all good choices. They all seem very competent and capable and have clear signs of being good in at least 1 of the 2 categories mentioned.
All the other candidates seem to have some pretty big question marks in at least one of the categories. Doesn't mean they would fail, but you have to set some interview criteria otherwise you're just "going with your gut."
Last edited by a moderator: