Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even that wasn’t the entire report.
It’s so cute when antivaxxers learn something that’s common knowledge among the ’normies’
Exactly. You cannot prove your own stance. Much like every liberal. Just regurgitating what CNN tells you to say.
Well obviously it wasn’t the entire report. He was reading the conclusion of said report.
Go ahead… prove it wrong!!!
When you’re on tilt, you just make stuff up :biglaugh:
that dude owns your balls eunuch... might want to play nicerWhen you’re on tilt, you just make stuff up :biglaugh:
The report wasn’t wrong. Never said that, with the exception of the funding. Ron Paul’s semen’s remedial understanding of the report was wrong.
He was not quoting a Newsweek article. He asked the council to give a copy of the report to Dr. Fauci lol
Senator Paul gave his own summary of the study, then quoted Dr. Ebright from the National Review article (wrote Newsweek by mistake). Senator Paul had an except of the National Review article blown up behind him.
Senator Paul: (50:51)
In this paper, Dr. Shi credits the NIH and lists the actual number of the grant that she was given by the NIH. In this paper, she took two bat coronavirus genes, spike genes, and combined them with a SARS related backbone to create new viruses that are not found in nature. These lab created viruses were then to shown to replicate in humans. These experiments combined genetic information from different coronaviruses that infect animals, but not humans, to create novel artificial viruses able to infect human cells. Viruses that in nature only infect animals were manipulated in the Wu Han lab to gain the function of infecting humans. This research fits the definition of the research that the NIH said was subject to the pause in 2014 to 2017, a pause in funding on gain of function, but the NIH failed to recognize this, defines it away, and it never came under any scrutiny. Dr. Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist from Rutgers, described this research in Wu Han as the Wu Han lab used NIH funding to construct novel chimeric SARS related to coronaviruses able to infect human cells and laboratory animals. This is high risk research that creates new potential pandemic pathogens, potential pandemic pathogens that exist only in the lab, not in nature. This research matches ... these are Dr. Ebright's words. This research matches, indeed epitomizes the definition of gain of function research, done entirely in Wu Han, for which there was supposed to be a federal pause. Dr. Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to Congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th, where you claimed that the NIH never funded gains of function research in Wu Han.
Then Senator Paul and Dr. Faucci debated whether the study was "gain of function."
LOLAh, I see the resident moron continues to check in.
Because Fauci said so lol yeah we know that’s all you got. I’m gonna go ahead and side with the scientist who wrote the report.