- Thread starter
- #21
Maximus...
So people can praise lovey smith for that great bears defense and bill belechick for the pats success on defense but jeff fisher gets no credit or blame for this teams defense? When our defense was good in 99 and 2000 it was called jeff fisher's defense. Not now? Fisher is at all the practices, he is at all the meetings, he is there when the game plans are made. The buck stops with him not jimmy s. That is his side of the ball and that is where his expertise lies. If the defense is poorly prepared to play it's as much on him as anyone else.
And yes fisher hired jimmy s and has kept him on for the last 5 years.
Want to say that fisher can still win and is a good coach? Fine but a great coach? A top 5 coach? Not after this year. This was one of the poorest prepared teams i have ever seen with no fire, no intensity. Problems or deficiancies were either not addressed or not addressed soon enough and it wasn't until the last week of the season before he even seemed disturbed by this team .
So people can praise lovey smith for that great bears defense and bill belechick for the pats success on defense but jeff fisher gets no credit or blame for this teams defense? When our defense was good in 99 and 2000 it was called jeff fisher's defense. Not now? Fisher is at all the practices, he is at all the meetings, he is there when the game plans are made. The buck stops with him not jimmy s. That is his side of the ball and that is where his expertise lies. If the defense is poorly prepared to play it's as much on him as anyone else.
And yes fisher hired jimmy s and has kept him on for the last 5 years.
Want to say that fisher can still win and is a good coach? Fine but a great coach? A top 5 coach? Not after this year. This was one of the poorest prepared teams i have ever seen with no fire, no intensity. Problems or deficiancies were either not addressed or not addressed soon enough and it wasn't until the last week of the season before he even seemed disturbed by this team .