- Thread starter
- #141
And I started Cousins and guy I was playing had Dallas defense….didn’t end well for meDerrick Henry had more fantasy points as a passer than Kirk Cousins this week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I started Cousins and guy I was playing had Dallas defense….didn’t end well for meDerrick Henry had more fantasy points as a passer than Kirk Cousins this week.
I have cousins and dak on my team. Hummed and hawed about it all week ended up going with dark luckily. Sorry you were on the other end lolAnd I started Cousins and guy I was playing had Dallas defense….didn’t end well for me
Definitely one of the all-time greats... and yet one of his greatest contributions to sports was a Sports Center commercial:I forgot how good LT was. Dual threat and did it for a long time.
Something 2 net yards and like 6 punts.As bad as our offense is, at least we're not the Jets.
it was aired here tooSomething 2 net yards and like 6 punts.
that was the televised game in SD. Literally the worst of the week, maybe ever that I’ve seen.
This is pretty random although not really a stat.
View attachment 20229
I think it’s funny how many people comment that KC gets the calls when they are the biggest complainers (per twitter) complaining about calls going the other way.
I’d argue that they are more talented than that, they can eat many d1cks. Probably a full bag.Chiefs fans can eat a dick
The problem with the randomness of that list is that it still doesn’t really give full explanation to the game.
The problem with the randomness of that list is that it still doesn’t really give full explanation to the game.
They out gained Min by 50 yards, not too lobsided.
Got outrushed, only a few yards.
We’re only 3/10 on 3rd down vs Min much better 8/15.
They gave up more sacks 3:1.
They ran 11 less plays while also losing clock control by 13 minutes.
all that said, curious who put THAT specific list together, went through every other NFL game, and discovered undefeated streak. It’s almost a case of thinking NE “should” have won, but honestly that statistically was a very close game.
I can understand that but even if you have a few people looking up nothing but historic stats, someone had to go, what’s the record when a QB’s completes 70%?It's Opta Stats, it's literally their job.
I can understand that but even if you have a few people looking up nothing but historic stats, someone had to go, what’s the record when a QB’s completes 70%?
Then, how about zero TO?
Scored 25+ points?
I’m sure at that point, you have a pretty winning record BUT
What about 400+ total yards?
Didn’t miss a FG? That’s a weird addition anyway.
Didn’t get penalized for, let’s throw out a random, 60+ yards?
And for the icing, the opponent had less yards?
None of anything there has me convinced that either NE deserved to win that game or any kind of actual streak was broken by losing.
Not gonna lie, a dream job for me.They come up with some wild ass stats for everything. In this case, they jumbled every stat they could find it seems. I guess when you get paid for that kind of stuff, you can waste the time.
100% The Pat's should have won this game. Every high variance big swing went the Vikes way. They have been running this way all season, and that's fine it happens but it's unsustainableThe problem with the randomness of that list is that it still doesn’t really give full explanation to the game.
They out gained Min by 50 yards, not too lobsided.
Got outrushed, only a few yards.
We’re only 3/10 on 3rd down vs Min much better 8/15.
They gave up more sacks 3:1.
They ran 11 less plays while also losing clock control by 13 minutes.
all that said, curious who put THAT specific list together, went through every other NFL game, and discovered undefeated streak. It’s almost a case of thinking NE “should” have won, but honestly that statistically was a very close game.
I guess that gets to the subjectivity of momentum or refs.100% The Pat's should have won this game. Every high variance big swing went the Vikes way. They have been running this way all season, and that's fine it happens but it's unsustainable