- Thread starter
- #581
He was the difference in the game. He flipped the field several times.
I said they should keep him over Kern and that was the correct decision.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was the difference in the game. He flipped the field several times.
I said they should keep him over Kern and that was the correct decision.
You and half the board. The other half was just sentimental about losing Kern. Understandable, but clearly Stoneman is a rare talent.
I said they should keep him over Kern and that was the correct decision.
Wish JRob could get lucky with OL like he did with StonehouseYou and half the board. The other half was just sentimental about losing Kern. Understandable, but clearly Stoneman is a rare talent.
I may have missed a post about this but has there been any word about the injury to Fulton? We cannot afford to lose him!
I think that was just a cramp.
Downing’s former team today. Can they take him back for free?
And then the Colts beat KC and the Jags kicked the Bolts Butts!Raiders are the more desperate team. If they lose they are cooked in that division. If we lose … so are the Colts today and it’s still only the Jags and Texans they gotta leapfrog (not like it matters though - Titans just don’t got it this year).
So glad to get a win. But why when something works ( throwing the ball to Henry) do we quit doing it? When we get people down we never finish it? We should have won that game by 3 touchdowns.
Tannehill has a tendency to try to squeeze passes in... Sometimes that means throwing low and hoping the guy goes down and gets it etc. But yeah, it does seem to happen a lot. But again, I think it's because Tannehill tries to make things happen when there's not necessarily an open guy a lot.I see way too many balls Tanny throws where the receivers are catching it and going down versus in stride. Is he throwing around their knees all the time?