Guest viewing is limited

Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seems a little generous, especially when with a big question mark a RG
Big time, IMO.

Even if the individual players on the OL are more talented, I think it takes time for a OL to gel as a unit. And I was hoping Jones would have been upgraded at C. It'll be the main thing I watch during the preseason.
 
Big time, IMO.

I think it usually takes time for a OL to gel and I was hoping Jones would have been upgraded at C. It'll be the main thing I watch during the preseason.
They really like Jones. He was the guy they went after early in FA when he came on board

IIRC he agreed to a deal before FA was technically open
 
I tend to think the guy cashes in soon and leaves us. He hasnt had much bad tape while a Titan, Someone will probably bet on him and pay him.

That is unless Conklin blows and is let go. Then Kelly stays... All in all we're sitting pretty at tackle right now.

Going to be hard to keep Conk beyond this year. If he sucks you do not want him. If he is good you probably cannot afford him.

Already paying a lot for the left side of the OL. Plus some key players need to be re-signed: Mariota, Byard
 
They must be assuming that Conk will return to pre injury form.

If he does, on paper we do have the potential to be a nasty top ranked Oline. Let’s hope!
 
Kelly legit most overrated titan by gotitans. Hes not a starting RT.

Conk needs to come back healthy.
 
Idk he was pretty damn good last yr

What game did he not do well in?

Agree.. Kelly played good when called upon last year.

I honestly wouldn't have a problem if Kelly moved Conk to guard or the bench at this point.
 
I have to say I am on the Kelly bandwagon as well. As I have been saying since Conk went out hurt, when he returns he should be moved to guard and Kelly continue at RT for the time being. If Conk shows he has kept his versatility and movement, then move him back to RT, but why take out someone we know is doing the job to experiment with Conk?
 
I have to say I am on the Kelly bandwagon as well. As I have been saying since Conk went out hurt, when he returns he should be moved to guard and Kelly continue at RT for the time being. If Conk shows he has kept his versatility and movement, then move him back to RT, but why take out someone we know is doing the job to experiment with Conk?
Because it's not an experiment and because when Conk played RT at his best he was an all-pro...Kelly will never be that.
 
I have to say I am on the Kelly bandwagon as well. As I have been saying since Conk went out hurt, when he returns he should be moved to guard and Kelly continue at RT for the time being. If Conk shows he has kept his versatility and movement, then move him back to RT, but why take out someone we know is doing the job to experiment with Conk?

Conk will have an entire training camp for them to assess if he can do the job. If he can and has returned to form he starts at tackle. If he can’t then you figure what to do with him. So there is no experiment. They will make a decision based on what they see on the field during training camp.
 
Because it's not an experiment and because when Conk played RT at his best he was an all-pro...Kelly will never be that.
Glad to see you know that Conk is "at his best" again. Good news. Absolutely, in that case, keep him at RT. Just curious, where did you get this info from? I haven't seen it anywhere.
 
Conk will have an entire training camp for them to assess if he can do the job. If he can and has returned to form he starts at tackle. If he can’t then you figure what to do with him. So there is no experiment. They will make a decision based on what they see on the field during training camp.
Oh, wow, an entire training camp huh? That is fantastic. That is such a long time for them to access him. There is no way there could possibly be any question marks on any player ever after they have gone through training camp. I am so glad there are such informative posters on this board.
 
Oh, wow, an entire training camp huh? That is fantastic. That is such a long time for them to access him. There is no way there could possibly be any question marks on any player ever after they have gone through training camp. I am so glad there are such informative posters on this board.

When you assessing how a player has bounced back from injury training camp can tell a team a lot. Last year he didn’t play during training camp or preseason, so they had to find out in a game. If they had seen him preseason last year they likely would have kept him out longer. No reason they can’t have a good sense of where he is at during training camp and preseason. Will it answer all questions? Maybe not, but they will have a lot of information to go on...unlike last year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top