Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just read that elsewhere and was relieved. I am not a big Davis fan, but not much behind him.
Glad he is ok, but this just exposes how big of a need OL depth is. We dont have anyone capable of filling in well for Saffold or Nate. That's a problem. I still wish we would bring in Warford.
I think Kelly played G at some point. He could slide to Davis’s spot for the rookie to play T.If Nate misses time, they'd plug in Panda. It wouldn't be a catastrophe. Could actually be good to get our rookie some experience.
You didnt watch Kelly at Guard did you....I think Kelly played G at some point. He could slide to Davis’s spot for the rookie to play T.
As bad as playing a rookie T at G?You didnt watch Kelly at Guard did you....
He sucked!
Warford. Warford. Warford!As bad as playing a rookie T at G?
This.Warford. Warford. Warford!
Crap. He needs to unopt...
It's possible, but I think it would be the other way around. Kelly is best when playing RT, and I think it is more natural for a big guy coming from college to plug in at G. Less of a liability against the fast DEs.I think Kelly played G at some point. He could slide to Davis’s spot for the rookie to play T.
This even though it dosnt sound good either. Only positive would be getting him play time.It's possible, but I think it would be the other way around. Kelly is best when playing RT, and I think it is more natural for a big guy coming from college to plug in at G. Less of a liability against the fast DEs.