How's Tannehill better than Brady? Brady at 41 had better all around stats compared to Tannehill.
Tannehill is a top 15 quarterback, Brady is still a top 5, and his career was elite, and still is elite.
That was a good question posted....the obvious answer to the question is....we should have signed Brady over Tannehill. And looking forward to next season, Brady will still post better stats than Tannehill at 42. And how does having a bad defense justify signing Tannehill over Brady? Tannehill is suited better for a team that has a bad defense? Brady is significantly better than Tannehill there's no argument there.