JR1980 said:. "The bust bar? Dude has been straight ass in the NFL. I have no problems if you like the kid and his time at Oregon, but he has been abysmal in the NFL."
Sure, Mariota has not played to his great potential, and at times has looked stiffer than a board, so in all fairness to him, we need to include Vrabel, all OCs and other coaches that worked with Mariota as being "bust bars" and "abysmal" as well. What makes them so "not to blame" that we would overlook their inefficiencies?
Mariota is considered to have regressed but I don't know how it's possible for a QB and a QB alone to regress unless he had a little help from the demons in his ear.
If Mariota receives a play to run with the ball to the opponents endzone and jump up & down until he's tackled, and he does so, should we blame him, only? If he's told to pass the ball without an adequate supply of blockers some six consecutive times and on the sixth attempt gets sacked, fumbles and the opponent runs it in for a TD, do we blame him, only? Also shxtty formations and sets where a 3rd down is dead in the water. blame him, only? I think much or all of the blame should be on the one that told him to do that. What? We're gonna turn a blind eye to this?
Mariota should have refused to play for a team unless he was happy with the experience and success of the coaching staff because dimwits can ruin his career. But it's all about da money, we know that.
Coaches rarely point the finger at themselves but anybody that knows something about the game will tell you that it takes at least two to tango. If you don't believe that, just ask Tom Brady if he would have been successful without the wits of Bill Bellichick. He would tell you that he couldn't have done it without him.
It's two or three people working together that makes a QB look good. Two or three becoming one. If the QB goes down they all go down. So there are other @$$e$ to fry here for Mariota's offensive woes.