- Thread starter
- #3,681
Put simply, I think you hurt your chances to repeat but probably helped the longterm prospects of your team.
No doubt
I felt more comfortable making the trade after getting Rogers though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Put simply, I think you hurt your chances to repeat but probably helped the longterm prospects of your team.
I think it was just a late round pick, but he tore his acl immediately after.
Oh I'm not ruling it out by any means. But I think they are going to give Sankey every chance to succeed before it comes to that.I think it's a legitimate idea that Cobb could start. Sankey looked pretty damn bad.
and this 2nd I'm giving up was JCB'S pick I got for Jimmy friggin Garropolo (in addition to a 3rd and a 2016 1st).
Worst trade by far. You should have been charged with robbery.
It was pretty bad but he's the one who offered it to me.Worst trade by far. You should have been charged with robbery.
im the one who goated him into trading for jimmy g. hook me up with a lil something as a thank you...like a 5 or 6 rounder.It was pretty bad but he's the one who offered it to me.
Ensco... you should go ahead and execute this trade.
I wanna explore all options before the draft starts.
That's absurd to say when they haven't even played a down. And none are likely to be starters week 1. While Sankey will be.Sankey is just not above those guys. But to each their own
Yeah I'm wondering who they realistically expect to be there at 21 that's so much better. Keeping in mind I have no need for WRs.I think most of you when faced with what's left at #21 overall would've preferred to roll the dice with Sankey than take one of the remaining RBs there.
We'll see who goes in the late 2nd.
That's absurd to say when they haven't even played a down. And none are likely to be starters week 1. While Sankey will be.