- Thread starter
- #3,361
Name of the game manI really didn't want to trade both Mett and Garropolo.
Was surprised to get a deal done with JCB because he's a notorious lowballer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Name of the game manI really didn't want to trade both Mett and Garropolo.
Was surprised to get a deal done with JCB because he's a notorious lowballer.
Well seeI guess 520 doesn't realize that 3.2 and 4.2 are more or less useless picks. Also Marshall is almost useless at this point in his career anyways.
This trade would've been blocked if you weren't commish!
Yeah definitely. Just like in the real league, you never really know until it actually plays out. I've had my fair share of trades over the years I thought I easily won and it ended up not being the case.Never once voted one a trade sometimes the guy that's getting screwed at first ends up winning the trade
Ensco, you might as well stop sending me trade offers. These are all ridiculous. Lol
The last one made me actually lol... I give you Hyde + #4 overall and I get Watkins? No. You'd end up with Hyde, Gordon, Cooper, and White. That's wrong.
#4 is off the table unless you offer something really good... Can't let you have #2,3, and 4 unless I get something really good in return.
offers sentIf anyone is interested in 4.3 and 4.10 for their 3rd hit me up.
If anyone is interested in 2.9, 3.9 and JCB's 2016 1st for their 1st this year hit me up.
(Willing to negotiate depending on where the selection is)
cant even get me a counter!Gonna have to pass on that bro...
You wanted the #2 for a second and Hyde lol. Just as bad. I had to reply with ridiculousness!
I think you're overvaluing Watkins now though. I feel like I'm taking the bigger risk with him since he has no QB.
I suppose if we're looking years down the road, Watkins will be the better option. But right now, I can't give up more to get Watkins than you give to get Hyde.
I love Watkins, but he's such a wildcard. I feel like Hyde is the safer player for the time being.
Hyde + 2.4 for your #2 pick isn't THAT bad. You're taking Gordon there, and while Gordon is the better RB, it's not by a landslide. Giving you Hyde + #4 pick for Watkins is beyond insane IMO.
Yes but I'm better off keeping Watkins and just drafting the playmaking RB in a better situation. So to give Watkins for a rb and a second makes no sense. I won't get a player of Watkins calibre even in a bad situation. And I wouldn't get Gordon who's obviously the higher upside RB as well.
Watkins would cost a top 5 pick in this draft. Hyde would amount to a second.
Asking a 1 and 2 for a higher 1 isn't out of the question
IMO in this draft Hyde would've easily been a top 10 pick. Probably top 7. He'd be the #3 RB available behind Gurley and Gordon.
That's my issue with it. So you were basically wanting a #4 and #7 for the #2. In the actual NFL draft, that could make sense. In FF, I think it's way too much.
Either way, our deals are way off of what we're willing to agree to.
I'd consider Watkins for #4 straight up... which is what you just said he's worth. Not sure why you thought you could get that AND Hyde. Lol