- Thread starter
- #581
no..Intentional?
I got him confused with smith
which makes my point a total NOT a point
still glad Pruitt playing well
Well hell turns out I was half right... point is Pruitt did leave
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no..Intentional?
I havent checked out our snap counts for a few weeks, but some interesting observations recently:
- Mabin saw 100% vs the Chiefs, Jackrabbit dropped to 75% having seen basically 100% in our first 6 games
- Byard only 75% vs the Chiefs, Cruikshank 100%. Not sure whats up there.
- Landry and Big Jeff have been playing 90% + but dropped to 70%'s vs the Chiefs. I see this as a good thing.
- Molden has had over 90% in the last 2 weeks. He's really stepping up
- Radunz saw the field ahead of Corey Levin when Saffold went down
- Mcnichols more snaps than Evans - be interesting to see if this changes as Evans eases back in
I don’t think it’s as easy to just make Pruitt TE #1 as just moving around depth charts.
I’ll argue he’s been the best TE so far (not great but good) but it falls more on how Defenses are playing him. We can call him #1 and put him on the field more but if Firkser is out there, he probably still receives more attention, at least as pass catcher goes.
Makes me wonder why we didn't retain Pruitt to begin with. He was cheap and we lost Jannu. Why not at least bring him into camp? If not for the injuries (Moore and Hudson) he still might not be on the team.
I thought he left... but I had confused him with johnny smithThere is a possibility that Pruitt wanted to shop himself as a free agent.
He signed with the 49ers in the offseason. And then we immediately signed him after they cut him at the end of pre-season.