Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it on the field review? I doubt it. It will probably end up speeding games up a little if they are doing reviews from a remote location. They can make the call before a coach challenges, delays, or calls a time out.That makes no sense. Any questionable 4th down already has a different reason for review.
it should catch the 'obvious ones' but nothing gonna change where they spot the ball under the giant pile of fattysIs it on the field review? I doubt it. It will probably end up speeding games up a little if they are doing reviews from a remote location. They can make the call before a coach challenges, delays, or calls a time out.
True, I also doubt on field review. I don’t know how it would speed it up, but probably won’t slow it down in most cases. Just seems stupid to bother on so many obvious plays.Is it on the field review? I doubt it. It will probably end up speeding games up a little if they are doing reviews from a remote location. They can make the call before a coach challenges, delays, or calls a time out.
Did you go do it from the Titans facility, cause that woulda been gangsta lol.in honor of NPF, I placed a 5 dollar bet on the NYJ ML tonight..............
Did you go did it from the Titans facility, cause that woulda been gangsta lol.
I say it would speed it up because review would become part of the game. Every play would be reviewed by someone at a remote location. That way, just by sheer repetition, the whole challenge and review process goes quicker.True, I also doubt on field review. I don’t know how it would speed it up, but probably won’t slow it down in most cases. Just seems stupid to bother on so many obvious plays.
I happen to stand on the get rid of any auto review standpoint and only give challenges. Up the # allowed, but say a max of 12 plays could be reviewed (3 per half W or L)
Love it lol!I really should lol.. I haven't been to Tennessee since 2021 for my grandmothers funeral down there... I think it may be time for a road trip to see family and go rogue on some bets lol.... paddle up to the bubble in a kayak on the Cumberland. lmao
I think I get what you’re saying. I just think less reviews makes refs make a call that they don’t currently. they auto review TO and TD, when it’s close enough, it goes to ref review. They also have the rare occasions the refs admit to missing a play and review it on their own.I say it would speed it up because review would become part of the game. Every play would be reviewed by someone at a remote location. That way, just by sheer repetition, the whole challenge and review process goes quicker.
If the only time plays were reviewed was by challenge, the whole process would be slow and cumbersome simply by having to start and stop the process for each review.
Also, I’m finding it very difficult to adequately explain what I’m thinking, so there’s that.
The following rule changes for the 2023 season were approved at the NFL Owners' MeetingWhat are any "new rules" they laid down at the owners meetings... I haven't bothered to check
Allowing the number 0 is the coolest.The 3rd QB, Tripping going from 10 to 15 yards and Launching from one foot are the biggest.
I thought the same thing."Launching from one foot to attack an opponent became illegal, changing the current rule of both feet."
What does that even mean? If you dive for a tackle, you have to have both feet on the ground before you make the dive?
Can you imagine a game ending like that. 10 second run off. Game over.Also not a fan of a 10 second run off if the refs made an incorrect call under 2 minutes.
I won’t be surprised to see a game end on a booth review with like 8 seconds left, and INT or fumble gets overturned just to end the game instead of giving the team the ball back with a stopped clock down.
On kickoffs, a fair catch made at or behind the 25 yard line will be awarded at the 25 yard line, mirroring the college football rule adopted in 2018.