- Thread starter
- #801
Their programming is complete.A lot of feminist here at gotitans.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their programming is complete.A lot of feminist here at gotitans.
betas gonna betaA lot of feminist here at gotitans.
I don’t think it’s feminist to not care if a ref is female.
Also not feminist to argue that the possible delay in reaction probably won’t make a difference.
Don’t need another 40 year old kicker. Try to find a good young one that can stick around a while and who’s leg isn’t losing distance all the time.
I wouldn't be mad at it. Would rather get Jake Moody in the draft but I'm good with anyone that can kick beyond 50 yards
That or Matt Gay would be a nice signing.Don’t need another 40 year old kicker. Try to find a good young one that can stick around a while and who’s leg isn’t losing distance all the time.
That or Matt Gay would be a nice signing.
At 40 why would Gould not want to stay with a team that was close to a SB?
I’d honestly take Moody as high as the 5th round. That important IMO.I wouldn't be mad at it. Would rather get Jake Moody in the draft but I'm good with anyone that can kick beyond 50 yards
I often wondered if a kicker was automatic from 60 and under. Would he be worth the first overall pick? I'd assume so.I’d honestly take Moody as high as the 5th round. That important IMO.
Only one taken in first round if I can remember. Raiders took Janikowski. He was superb, almost Kern level!I often wondered if a kicker was automatic from 60 and under. Would he be worth the first overall pick? I'd assume so.
I don’t think a K would ever be a 1st overall but I could see a 1st rounder although I think those days are likely in the past.I often wondered if a kicker was automatic from 60 and under. Would he be worth the first overall pick? I'd assume so.
I would too given the impact of most 5th rounders.I’d honestly take Moody as high as the 5th round. That important IMO.
I agree with the BS of players threatening to sit 5th year options.I don’t understand the point in having 5th year options on draft picks if they refuse to play on them. Can teams get a refund for players like Farley and Wilson that contribute nothing? Everything always has to be to the players’ benefit. Slowly ruining the league.
This simply isn't true.I don’t understand the point in having 5th year options on draft picks if they refuse to play on them. Can teams get a refund for players like Farley and Wilson that contribute nothing? Everything always has to be to the players’ benefit. Slowly ruining the league.