- Thread starter
- #361
We can cut a little over 50 million in cap pretty easily, giving us a little over 25 million to play with before FA. If we move on from Tanne, we would be 55 million under the cap.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
Guest viewing is limited
- You have a limited number of page views remaining
- 4 guest views remaining
- Register now to remove this limitation
-
Week five of NFL Pick 'Ems is now live. Join the pool at https://titanstalk.com/pickem/picks/nfl-pools.1/?week_id=5 Picks close on Thursday Oct 3rd @ 7:15pm central
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA
- Thread starter archived
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
We can cut a little over 50 million in cap pretty easily, giving us a little over 25 million to play with before FA. If we move on from Tanne, we would be 55 million under the cap.
- Thread starter
- #362
And be without a QB.We can cut a little over 50 million in cap pretty easily, giving us a little over 25 million to play with before FA. If we move on from Tanne, we would be 55 million under the cap.
- Thread starter
- #363
And be without a QB.
I'm on the side of the drafting one (trade up if we have to) or signing Brady spending the draft capital on OL and WR.
- Thread starter
- #364
We can draft next year or two! Bring a rookie into this chit OL, be 3 wins for 2 yearsI'm on the side of the drafting one (trade up if we have to) or signing Brady spending the draft capital on OL and WR.
- Thread starter
- #365
Brady < Tammy at this point! Did you watch that last game? Holy chit he stunk donkey balls!I'm on the side of the drafting one (trade up if we have to) or signing Brady spending the draft capital on OL and WR.
- Thread starter
- #366
Yeah I'm not big on signing Brady, he's close to being done..I mean come on he's 45! We can't afford Rodgers.. Tannehill is our best option but we need some cap relief to improve the OL and WR groups.
FA wise... Mayfield? Darnold? I don't think they are upgrades over Tannehill
FA wise... Mayfield? Darnold? I don't think they are upgrades over Tannehill
- Thread starter
- #368
Need WR upgrade as well...Burks showed promise but Woods is likely gone and Westbrook-Ikline scares no oneSpend all the money on OLine and draft Johnston at 11 and we have a pretty good team.
- Thread starter
- #369
- Thread starter
- #371
Yeah, Brady and Rodgers are both going to play for every team in the league according to the "chatter".
I wouldn't hate trading for Lance, but he's still a complete unknown at this point and to be honest, I haven't watched him play enough to get a feel. But wouldn't give up much and probably wouldn't thrust him in to a starting gig right away.
- Thread starter
- #372
I'm on the side of the drafting one (trade up if we have to) or signing Brady spending the draft capital on OL and WR.
Hoping to get lucky on a rookie or a 45 year old QB aren't the best odds.
Tannehill may not be HOF but he's the best bet for the Titans at the moment.
The OL and WRs etc will have to be shuffled for any QB to have a chance.
- Thread starter
- #373
We can draft next year or two! Bring a rookie into this chit OL, be 3 wins for 2 years
We're probably not picking this high next year. We are what we are, which is a .500ish team. I'd rather not linger in mediocrity. Rip the band-aid off and move on.
- Thread starter
- #374
Hoping to get lucky on a rookie or a 45 year old QB aren't the best odds.
Tannehill may not be HOF but he's the best bet for the Titans at the moment.
The OL and WRs etc will have to be shuffled for any QB to have a chance.
Well we know the odds with Tanne, and they aren't good. I'd rather not linger in mediocrity.
- Thread starter
- #375
Brady < Tammy at this point! Did you watch that last game? Holy chit he stunk donkey balls!
Yes I did. He had no OL help and no running game and still put up better numbers than Tanne the last 2 postseasons.
Tanne ain't better than Brady at 46.
- Thread starter
- #377
Well we know the odds with Tanne, and they aren't good. I'd rather not linger in mediocrity.
So you'd rather gamble on being on the dumps than continue with a QB that has been a winner since starting in TN (outside of this disastrous season for the whole team)
Tannehill obviously isn't the answer for ever...but for the moment dumping him for an unknown just doesn't make sense, imo. Even if the Titans draft a QB in the first, I'd rather have Tannehill around for another year than throw a rookie out there. And Brady just doesn't make sense.
- Thread starter
- #378
We know THill was 1 game away from the SB and a playoff contender 3/4 years. Those are better results than 90% of the league’s QBs.Well we know the odds with Tanne, and they aren't good. I'd rather not linger in mediocrity.
I guess as long as we’re going to completely simplify everything the QB does, we should look at the actual results vice “feelings” regarding his last playoff game.
“but…….” With specific game vice full body of work and “everyone else carried him” arguments now.
- Thread starter
- #379
3 totals TD’s on the season. They should do away with the Pro Bowl at this point. It’s meaningless. Most popularity contests in life are though…
Last edited by a moderator:
- Thread starter
- #380
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
