- Thread starter
- #81
We are not losing to lousy Buffalo again.
I don't think Buffalo is lousy. Stefon Diggs, Zack Moss, best D line in the league, top 5 secondary in the league.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are not losing to lousy Buffalo again.
I don't think Buffalo is lousy. Stefon Diggs, Zack Moss, best D line in the league, top 5 secondary in the league.
The Titans are not losing to Denver. I don’t give a damn about what some historical stat says. The Broncos don’t have a good QB. The loss to them last year was the start of the seasons turn around. We don’t lose here.We are not losing to lousy Buffalo again.
The Texans will be that bad. They could lose to Jacksonville. But I get your point.They play the Jags week 5, but yeah, that’s a brutal first half. I just hope it doesn’t get Obrien fired too fast. Really hoping the Texans languish in 6-8 win purgatory for a while. Like a decade or two.
Yea, it's a bit surprising that vegas doesnt think anyone besides the ravens on our schedule will win more than 9 games.I saw that too, but when i look at our schedule it doesn't scream second easiest to me.
I don't think Buffalo is lousy. Stefon Diggs, Zack Moss, best D line in the league, top 5 secondary in the league.
The Titans are not losing to Denver. I don’t give a damn about what some historical stat says. The Broncos don’t have a good QB. The loss to them last year was the start of the seasons turn around. We don’t lose here.
Allen isn’t that bad. He can scramble and make some throws. You’re really underselling him at “horrible”.Idk about best D line in the league. That’s a huge stretch. They also have a horrible QB.
File:Vespa militare2.JPG - WikipediaAllen isn’t that bad. He can scramble and make some throws. You’re really underselling him at “horrible”.
He’s not a great QB, but he’s good enough to win some games with that good D.
Using last years records to create a “strength of schedule” doesn’t really work since half the teams flip from good to bad or vice versa every year. For all we know, the Bengals could go 12-6 this year and the Packers could go 6-12.I saw that too, but when i look at our schedule it doesn't scream second easiest to me.
Allen isn’t that bad. He can scramble and make some throws. You’re really underselling him at “horrible”.
He’s not a great QB, but he’s good enough to win some games with that good D.
Both VY and Tebow were atrocious at comp % and bad mechanics throwing.Tim Tebow won games at QB too. VY... stop with that nonsense. That's not how you judge QB's anymore.
Both VY and Tebow were atrocious at comp % and bad mechanics throwing.
I’m in full agreement that you don’t say a QB is good or bad based on W/L. (Never was, not just limited to now).
What I said was Allen isn’t “horrible”. He showed a big improvement between year 1-2 and although he still has room to improve, he’s not that bad, just not all that good. With the D Buffalo has, he is good enough to make them a dangerous team.
The one where we have the 2nd easiest SOS is using vegas odds for this season.Using last years records to create a “strength of schedule” doesn’t really work since half the teams flip from good to bad or vice versa every year. For all we know, the Bengals could go 12-6 this year and the Packers could go 6-12.