A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #1 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I have his rating at an astounding 1.32 6 of 19 for 57 yards, and 2 picks. Rivers was 99.1 in case you were wondering
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I have his rating at an astounding 1.32 6 of 19 for 57 yards, and 2 picks. Rivers was 99.1 in case you were wondering
A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #3 But hey, he must be better than Volek. Or maybe Fisher just wants to be fired.
A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #4 So you saying his performance counts as a positive (integer).
A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #5 Toly said: Well, at least he wasn't sacked 7 times. Click to expand... His stats would have been better had he been.....:banned:
Toly said: Well, at least he wasn't sacked 7 times. Click to expand... His stats would have been better had he been.....:banned:
A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #6 I have updated my Jim Schwartz spreadsheet of shame with the past two weeks.
A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #8 It's actually worse. It's negative 3 according to this. http://www.footballguys.com/qbrating.htm
A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #9 On 60 mins following the game talking with Romo They showed Him hit Collins when he was a panther and break his jaw in two places, I watched it three times on tivo...plan on watching it a few more before the nights over
On 60 mins following the game talking with Romo They showed Him hit Collins when he was a panther and break his jaw in two places, I watched it three times on tivo...plan on watching it a few more before the nights over
A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #10 http://www.primecomputing.com/ Gotta agree with the Don according to this.
A archived Prospect LEGEND Moola 0 Sep 17, 2006 #11 It doesn't matter to me, he sucks no matter what it is.
