any current comments?????????????
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...ages?q=jim+schwartz+titans&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...ages?q=jim+schwartz+titans&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yep, he doesnt seem like the brightest guyTitanJeff said:I can't believe Schwartz would just abandon the schemes which worked so well at that time for the pathetic display of defense we have now.
:duckrun:
that also goes both ways. teams didnt run as much because they were behind. we had like 100 less rushing attempts against than jacksonville that year, but they had a full yard less in yard per carry against.Vigsted said:Back then the excuse was that opposing teams passed alot because they were behind
bigtitan53279 said:that also goes both ways. teams didnt run as much because they were behind. we had like 100 less rushing attempts against than jacksonville that year, but they had a full yard less in yard per carry against.
i've been saying that since the end of that season. people are just now starting to listen to me.Vigsted said:So basically you're saying Schwartz looked good in 2002 because we had a good offence... sounds about right.
TitanJeff said:I can't believe Schwartz would just abandon the schemes which worked so well at that time for the pathetic display of defense we have now.
:duckrun: