-
Place your wages for NFL week 5 at https://www.hfbmboards.com/bookie/nfl/ Wagers close at start of each game.
-
Wagers live for todays game 2's in the NLDS at https://www.hfbmboards.com/bookie/mlb/. Wagers close at start of each game
-
Place your wagers for NHL games on Tuesday Oct 8th https://www.hfbmboards.com/bookie/nhl/wagers close start of each game
Welcome To The HFBM Boards
Hockey, Football, Baseball & MMA
- Thread starter archived
- Start date
- Status
- Thread starter
- #4
Agreed. He's holding out and refusing to play under the Franchise tag. They also don't have a lot of leverage and hardly any cap space post Wilson contract. I could see him going for a 2nd rounder
- Thread starter
- #6
Last year he beasted out, but I don't think he's shown enough of a history to warrant a team giving up a 1st and then turning around signing him for a huge contract.
We all know certain players tend to play at a super high level in a contract year and this is clearly the case here.
- Thread starter
- #8
He's had 32 sacks and 8 FF's in the last 3 years and is pretty active against the run.
With that, the way Seattle pass rushers scare me. Seems like everybody can gets sacks in that role in that system. I flip on the televsion and see Bark Mingo and Dion Jordan ripping up people.
- Thread starter
- #10
You must not watch football. Get outside of Titansland, won’t you
- Thread starter
- #11
If we're giving a 1st, we should trade back to the end of the round first and pick up some additional picks! Say trade back from 19 to 32 for one of New Englands 2nd rounders, and then trade #32 for Clark.
New England weed have to want to trade up...I am not optimistic
- Thread starter
- #12
What do you mean?
- Thread starter
- #13
NE typically schemes pass rush rather than relying on a top edge rusher. I doubt they'd trade up for him to pay him more than Brady.
- Thread starter
- #14
Two things are bad about this. First, he had a history of domestic abuse I think in his college days...so that may scare some people off. It's one thing to invest a high draft pick...it's another to invest a high draft pick AND a huge chunk of your cap AND a ton of guaranteed money.
He's a top EDGE rusher in his prime, but the fact that Seattle doesn't want to pay a top EDGE rusher in his prime should tell us something.
He's a top EDGE rusher in his prime, but the fact that Seattle doesn't want to pay a top EDGE rusher in his prime should tell us something.
- Thread starter
- #16
If the draft unfolds in a bad way (all the 1st round dt and edge and other players we grade as first rounders are gone), and we have no trade back scenarios that we like, I might do it if the contract is structured in a way to shield the team against any personal issue coming up...like spreading his guaranteed money out over a few years, etc. He's very good, but so are a lot of guys in this draft.
I don't see us doing this. I think we're more likely to go EDGE in round 1 and sign Suh than take this guy on...but, he's pretty good!
- Thread starter
- #17
He's a violent idiot. We aren't trading a first and giving a bunch of money to a guy who the players and coaches have to walk on egg shells around. Imagine if he sucker punched one of our lineman like he did in Seattle. Lewan would literally kill him.
- Thread starter
- #19
I understand not wanting him for various reasons but one year wonder???
He had 10 sacks in 2016 starting 5 games but played in 15.
He had 9 sacks in 2017 starting 12 games but playing in 15.
He had 13 sacks in 2018 starting 15 games this year.
I don't see a one year wonder. He's a top 10 pass rusher with baggage.
- Thread starter
- #20
When a team openly wants to get rid of a player it makes me think they know something we don't. It's very different than a player openly wanting to leave a team. There's no way I'd give a first for him. Anytime a team openly looks to trade a player, I'm thinking a 3rd tops.
- Status